Answer:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
Explanation:
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 80 ÷ 5
= 16 tons of salt
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of pepper = 3 ÷ 1
= 3 tons of salt
Alphaland's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 5 ÷ 80
= 0.0625 tons of pepper
Betaton's opportunity cost of producing one ton of salt = 1 ÷ 3
= 0.3333 tons of pepper
Therefore, Betaton has a comparative advantage in producing pepper because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing pepper as compared to Alphaland. On the other hand, Alphaland has a comparative advantage in producing salt because it has the lower opportunity cost of producing salt as compared to Betaton.
Hence, Betaton is specialized in the production of pepper and Alphaland is specialized in the production of salt.
Trade is beneficial for both the nations when Alphaland buys pepper at a price lower than the 16 tons of salt and Betaton sells pepper at a price greater than 3 tons of salt.
Trade ratios:
5 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
10 tons of salt for 1 ton of pepper
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The cost of goods sold would increase by $2
Answer:
Investment in stock C is $122450.3311 rounded off to $122450.33
Explanation:
A portfolio which is equally as risky as market should have a beta equal to the beta of the market as beta is a measure of the riskiness. The beta of market is always equal to 1. The formula for beta of a portfolio is as follows:
Portfolio beta = wA * Beta A + wB * Beta B + ... + wN * Beta N
Where w represents the weight of each stock in the portfolio.
Let investment in stock C be x
1 = 146000/500000 * 0.91 + 134000/500000 * 1.36 + x/500000 * 1.51
1 = 0.26572 + 0.36448 + 1.51x / 500000
1 - 0.6302 = 1.51x / 500000
0.3698 * 500000 = 1.51x
1844900 / 1.51 = x
x = $122450.3311 rounded off to $122450.33
Answer:
D) Shared power
Explanation:
Power sharing refers to a situation where a team leader will allow the team members to have decision power and influence within the group. It is a system that distributes power among all members of the team in order to encourage greater participation in the decision making processes.
In this case, Desi considers that sharing power with his staff will encourage them to participate more in the planning process. When an employee feels that his participation is valued, he/she will not be afraid or indifferent to do so.
This best illustrates the value of the spacing effect.
This type of an effect refers to the fact that learning is better if it is extended over a long period of time. So, if you are studying for an exam, it is better to study for a month, where each day you will read a portion of a lesson, rather than pull an all-nighter and cram it all.
