Three tests that can be used to assess graduates include:
- Skills and knowledge psychometric tests.
- Ability and aptitude psychometric tests.
- Personality tests.
<h3>What are some tests that can be used to test graduates?</h3>
A skills and knowledge psychometric test will allow Hornbill Holdings to find out how knowledgeable a graduate is in their industry and its processes.
They can also use an ability and aptitude test to find out how adaptive the graduate is to new situations.
Personality tests can then find out if the graduate has the right type of personality for the culture at Hornbill Holdings.
Find out more on graduate testing at brainly.com/question/16321787.
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
JIT termed or stand for the Just in Time Inventory, it is a strategy or the plan of action, which is to increase the efficiency and decrease the waste through receiving the goods only as they are required in the process of the production, thereby decreasing the inventory costs.
So, the costs of the obsolescence, inventory financing and storage supervision could be decreased through the practice of the JIT (Just-in-time inventory).
Answer:
Steve Jobs coming back, Innovations, and Tim Cook taking over as COO
Explanation:
The fluctuations in stock prices of a company are due to improved performance of the company in meeting it's objectives and perception that the business will do better in the future.
In the given scenario there was an initial increase in Apple’s stock price from $27.97 to $702.10, an increase of 25 times.
This can be attributed to the return of Steve Jobs as the CEO of Apple. There was a confidence boost by his coming back. Also there were various innovations like: iPhone, iMac, iPod, and iTunes. These improved the performance and by extension share price of Apple.
However when Tim Cook took over as COO he reduced production by half resulting in stock price decrease by 37% from its peak in September 2012 until the end of March 2013, from $702.10 to $442.66.
Answer:
$9,249 for three months, $18,498 for six months.
Explanation:
Experts recommend that an emergency fund should include 3 to 6 months of cash to provide for living expenses.
The Potinsky household spends $37,000 annually, therefore, it spends $3,083 monthly ($37,000 / 12).
For a three-month emergency fund = $3,083 x 3
= $9,249
For a six-month emergency fund = $3,083 x 6
= $18,498
