Answer:
The German nightmare was a war on two fronts. Historically, Russia needed time to ‘mobilize’, that is, to call up reservists, equip them, and assign them to their regiments and platoons. So the logical way of operating was to attack and defeat the French first, before attacking the Russians. But in 1914 the Russians cheated; they mobilised before they announced it so their army was in the field quite a long time before the Germans expected it — and the dreaded war on two fronts materialised. The Germans were lucky in that their effective commander Ludendorff (who was technically 2ic) moved his troops about by train, so they were not already exhausted by a long and hurried march and were able to throw the Russians back into complete confusion and surrender.
So the Russians were defeated but not mortally injured, the French came close to defeat but just managed to stabilise a front, and the ‘despicable English Army’ saved itself from disaster by the narrowest Of margins.
Four years of continuous bloody slaughter were assured.
Glad I can Help
Well, considering a consumer economy needs low income workers to service, then it would be the poor.
The main idea is about farmers and how farming communities work on their own land.
Below are the choices that can be found elsewhere:
It led to a buildup of military force and the establishment of the navy.
<span>It laid the groundwork for a war between the states. </span>
<span>It caused both Spain and France to build alliances with the United States. </span>
<span>It set the stage for a government policy rejecting foreign involvement.
</span>
The answer is "It set the stage for a government policy rejecting foreign involvement. "
One major difference was the fact that more countries got in on the expansion. Germany and Belgium are a great example of that. The two countries were not really a part of the early expansions whereas they were from 1750 to 1914.
