1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
3 years ago
11

How did many texans financially support those involved in world war 1

History
2 answers:
forsale [732]3 years ago
7 0

Answer

Texans support those involved in world war 1 financially through;

• Donating funds that helped to rehabilitate kids that fought as soldiers in war

• Providing funds that were used for emergency aid such as food and shelter

• Donating to organizations such as Red Cross

Explanation

There are many charities that move around the world in countries affected by war events to help those affected by the war to get back to their day to day lives. These organizations ask for donations from well wishers to help in purchase of the basic items required by victims such as food and shelter. Most individuals are advised to take part in such donations that attempt to save a life of another person. Some organizations in Texas currently attempt to bring together warring groups to identify alternative methods of dealing with conflicts.

Hope this helps!

Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
3 0

Answer

Texans support those involved in world war 1 financially through;

i hope that helps :) tell me if i am right okie bye :>

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ME FAST ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST IF ITS GOOD
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

                  The number one cost is the amount of lives lost. At least 600,000 people died during the civil war. A human life has no price. So no other cost comes close to the amount of deaths that occurred because of the grueseom civil war. (I DONT HAVE THE ANALYZE IT PASSAGE SO I CAN'T PUT QUOTES.)            

       The war was costlier for the North. Even though they won, and they got what they wanted. And the south lost their slaves, the North paid way more in human lives. (Add quotes. If you don't have differences in human lives lost, just mention slaves were lost by south)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Can someone help plsssshdbdjajnsnswm
BartSMP [9]

Answer:delegated-powers shown to requirements

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
How did the Ming dynasty come to an end
arlik [135]
The Ming Dynasty came to an end as the Ariel Aisin-Gioroinvaded the mainland China and took over the original Ming government.

The course:

In 1644, the army of Ariel Aisin-Gioro infiltrated the mainland, soon took over Beijing,the Capital of Ming Dynasty.

A new emperor of Ariel Aisin-Gioro was then crowned as the absolute ruler of China, and the called the dynasty “Ching dynasty”.

Factors causing the end to Ming Dynasty:

The extremely one-sided power of emperor-
The emperors were very suspicious on their officials and helpers might took over their place.

Policies were then carry out to concentrate the ruling power to the emperor only.

However,this came with heavy duties as well, once the one who inherited the role of absolute ruler was not hard-working enough, the government’s ruling would go down the slope.

The treatment towards the officials- the Ming emperor treated their officials very harshly as they wanted to show their supremacy.

The officials had to kneel before the emperor when they talk no matter who they are. They also had to call themselves “slaves” before the ruler, and whenever they did some mthing that upset the emperor they might get beaten, sometimes to death.

Given the situation,the officials tried their best not to interfere with ruling lest getting punished. This caused the ruling to be ineffective without the help of officials. Causing the ruling to went down hill eventually.

Hope it helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following factors helped make inland transportation and commerce possible in the United States?
galben [10]
I think the answer would be c
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the events of 1919 justified Palmer’s actions? Why or why not?. write a paragraph
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

While the repeated bombings and discovery of bombs by the postal service undoubtedly created an atmosphere of suspicion, they do not justify the actions taken by Palmer and his office against those he suspected. Palmer specifically targeted foreign born groups without any evidence.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1838, the U.S. Army forced thousands of Cherokee people to march to the Indian Territory (in present-day Oklahoma) as part of
    12·2 answers
  • The French middle class and peasantry belonged to the FirstThirdFourthSecond Estate.
    8·1 answer
  • How did Philadelphia shape america at the turn of the 20th century?
    15·1 answer
  • What's the counterargument of the Declaration of Independence
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the United States shift from a policy of brinkmanship to detente
    9·1 answer
  • Complete the timeline below: 1682: Robert de La Salle claimed the Louisiana Territory for _________. 1763: The French ceded the
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a description of the presidency of Andrew Johnson?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think The spanish armada by The english was important
    9·1 answer
  • I NEED THIS QUESTION ANSWERED!!!! ASAP!! The Soviet Union was worried that the US and China would prosper and become more powerf
    12·1 answer
  • The Egyptians believed in which of the following?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!