All categories

3 years ago

Internal control systems are:________.

2 answers:

4 0

Answer: Internal control system are required by Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) to be documented and certified if the company's stock is traded on an exchange (a public company).

Explanation:

Internal controls are the procedures mechanisms and rules implemented by a business to ensure the integrity of its accounting and financial information, promote accountability, and also prevent fraud.

Besides complying with regulations and law and hindering employees from commiting fraud or stealing assets, internal controls can improve operational efficiency through the improvement in the timeliness and accuracy of financial reporting.

Internal controls are a vital business function for every company in the United States since the accounting scandals that occurred in the early 2000s. The Sarbanes Act of 2002 was to improve accuracy of corporate disclosures and protect investors from fraudulent activities.

Luda [366]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

Internal control systems are required by Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) to be documented and licensed if the company's stock is traded on an exchange (a public company).

Internal control system consists of 5 key elements:

Control environment t

Risk assessment

Control activities

Information and communication

Monitoring

You might be interested in

Which are factors that both budget constraint diagrams and production possibilities frontier diagrams highlight

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

scarcity, tradeoffs, efficiency, and opportunity costs.

7 0

2 years ago

If $1,000 is deposited in a certain bank account and remains in the account along with any accumulated interest, the dollar amou

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

The rate is greater than 8%

Explanation:

Given

$\small I = 1,000 \left (\left (1+\frac{r}{100} \right )^{n}-1 \right )$

Missing part of question

$I =210$

$n =2$

Required

Is r > 1

We have:

$\small I = 1,000 \left (\left (1+\frac{r}{100} \right )^{n}-1 \right )$

Substitute values for r and I

$210 = 1,000 \left (\left (1+\frac{r}{100} \right )^{2}-1 \right )$

Divide both sides by 1000

$0.210 = \left (\left (1+\frac{r}{100} \right )^{2}-1 \right )$

Add 1 to both sides

$1.210 = (1+\frac{r}{100} \right ))^{2}$

Take square roots of both sides

$\sqrt{1.210} = 1+\frac{r}{100}$

$1.1 = 1+\frac{r}{100}$

Subtract 1 from both sides

$0.1 = \frac{r}{100}$

Multiply both sides by 100

$r = 10$

$10 > 8$

Hence, the rate is greater than 8%

7 0

3 years ago

Dolan Company's accounting records reflect the following inventories: Dec. 31, 2017 Dec. 31, 2016Raw materials inventory $300,00

Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

$700,000

Explanation:

The computation of the total raw materials used is shown below:

= Beginning raw material inventory + purchase of raw material - ending raw material inventory

= $250,000 + $750,000 - $300,000

= $700,000

We simply added the purchase and deduct the ending inventory to the beginning inventory so that the raw material used could come

7 0

4 years ago

A developer purchased three oceanfront lots, each measuring 75 by 110 feet, for $20 per square foot. The developer later sold th

AleksAgata [21]

Answer: 21%

Explanation: The developer purchased 3 properties and he can buy each property for $20 per square foot.

Therefore: 75 × 110 =8250 square feet.

8250 × $20 = $165 000 per lot.

Each lot was sold for $200 000. Which means the developer made profits of:

$200 000 - $165 000 = $35 000 per lot.

The percentage of profit on each lot is:

Percentage of profit on cost amount:

= $\frac{35 000}{165 000}$

= 0.2121212 recurring × 100

= 21,21%

Percentage of profit on sale amount:

= $\frac{35000}{200000}$

= 0.175 × 100

= 17,5%

3 0

4 years ago

What is the problem with companies pursuing patents specifically to hinder, or prevent, competition?

Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago