1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amid [387]
3 years ago
5

Which best describes many of the postwar era’s writers and their works? fantastical progressive apathetic pessimistic

History
2 answers:
motikmotik3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is D) pessimistic.

<em>The option that best describes many of the post war’s eras writers and their works is pessimistic. </em>

A new generation of writers emerged after World War II. Some of them were immigrants that had another point of view, different from the American writer. African Americans and women’s participation became more prominent and other authors declared its sexual orientation that influenced in their works such as Truman Capote, Tennessee Williams, and James Baldwin. Most of them wrote about dark and pessimistic topics that resulted from the times lived in those post-war years.

matrenka [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:    D

Explanation:

took the quiz a few mins ago

You might be interested in
Which of the following is a true statement about the Harlem Renaissance?
Rzqust [24]
The answer is a. It was an intellectual and artistic movement
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did politics change global relations between countries in modern era?
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:The United States is today the only truly global power. Its military reach—whether on land, at sea, or in the air—extends to every point on the globe. Its economic prowess fuels world trade and industry. Its political and cultural appeal—what Joseph Nye has called soft power—is so extensive that most international institutions reflect American interests. America’s position in the world is unique—no other country in history has ever come close.

But is America’s exalted position sustainable? Militarily, the vast gap between the United States and everyone else is growing. Whereas defense spending in most other countries is falling, U.S. defense spending is rising rapidly. This year’s requested increase in defense spending is greater than the entire Chinese defense budget. Most remarkably, America can afford to spend more. Defense spending takes a smaller share of the U.S. gross domestic product than it did a decade ago—and even the Bush administration’s projected increases will produce an overall budget equal to only about 3.5 percent of GDP, about half of Cold War highs. There is little prospect of any country or group of countries devoting the resources necessary to begin competing with the United States militarily, let alone surpassing it.

Economically, the United States may not widen its edge over its competitors, but neither is it likely to fall behind. The U.S. economy has proven itself at least as adept as its major competitors in realizing the productivity gains made possible by information technology. Europe and Japan face severe demographic challenges as their populations rapidly age, creating likely labor shortages and severe budgetary pressures. China is modernizing rapidly, and Russia may have turned the corner, but their economies today are comparable in output to those of Italy and Belgium—and they have yet to develop a political infrastructure that can support sustained economic growth.

Which brings us to the issue of how to transform this unquestioned power into influence. Unless employed deftly, America’s military and economic superiority can breed resentment, even among its friends. A growing perception that Washington cares only about its own interests and is willing to use its muscle to get its way has fueled a worrisome gap between U.S. and European attitudes. European elites increasingly criticize the United States as being morally, socially, and culturally retrograde—especially in its perceived embrace of the death penalty, predatory capitalism, and fast food and mass entertainment. Europe has also begun to exercise diplomatic muscle in international institutions and other arenas, seeking to create new international regimes designed to limit America’s recourse to its hard power.

Explanation:

eptember 11 signaled the end of the age of geopolitics and the advent of a new age—the era of global politics. The challenge U.S. policymakers face today is to recognize that fundamental change in world politics and to use America’s unrivaled military, economic, and political power to fashion an international environment conducive to its interests and values.

For much of the 20th century, geopolitics drove American foreign policy. Successive presidents sought to prevent any single country from dominating the centers of strategic power in Europe and Asia. To that end the United States fought two world wars and carried on its four-decade-long Cold War with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet empire ended the last serious challenge for territorial dominion over Eurasia. The primary goal of American foreign policy was achieved.

During the 1990s, American foreign policy focused on consolidating its success. Together with its European allies, the United States set out to create, for the first time in history, a peaceful, undivided, and democratic Europe. That effort is now all but complete. The European Union—which will encompass most of Europe with the expected accession of 10 new members in 2004—has become the focal point for European policy on a wide range of issues. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has evolved from a collective defense alliance into Europe’s main security institution. A new relationship with Russia is being forged.

Progress has been slower, though still significant, in Asia. U.S. relations with its two key regional partners, Japan and South Korea, remain the foundation of regional stability. Democracy is taking root in South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Taiwan. U.S. engagement with China is slowly tying an economically surging Beijing into the global economy.

5 0
3 years ago
"I will not try to describe the impression that the temple, and in particular its portico, made on us," Champollion wrote. "The
Lisa [10]

Answer:

a porch or walkway attached to a building.

Explanation:

The separate dimensions of the structure shows that it must be a structure of some sort.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is western china considered to be more similar to central asia than eastern china? select one:
LuckyWell [14K]
The answer is B,I guess:)
3 0
3 years ago
Hello everyone ... :-) ​
Anna35 [415]
Hello! Vas happenin?


I hope you have a good day or a good sleep. Remember your beautiful just the way you are. If your a guy your awesome just the way you are. Don’t change for anyone


-Zayn Malik
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was considered a geographic barrier to early Georgian settlers because of heavy forests, dense undergrowt
    8·1 answer
  • What was the financial power of congress under the articles of confederation
    8·1 answer
  • How did Britain show its own power?
    13·2 answers
  • How were hospitals in the early modern period different from medieval hospitals?
    5·2 answers
  • Why were European countries competing to control global trade?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of studying history beginning with Reconstruction 1877 until 2013?
    9·1 answer
  • can strong nations maintain their power and influence without interfering with other nations' development?
    10·1 answer
  • In this lesson, you have learned that the cause of the Civil War is not as simple as it seems. It involved many issues and diffe
    11·1 answer
  • Which is an example of the violation of a right protected by the constitutiion
    5·2 answers
  • In the war of 1812 why was the war with Britain more difficult than the war hawks thought it would be?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!