Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Follows are the two ways of describing its high return:
Firstly, the mutual fund is invested in pretty unstable debt and is reciprocating with greater yields for taking a risk.
Secondly, during every decrease in bond yields, the finance kept bonds so the income on stocks exceeded this same rate of interest significantly. Remember that bond costs skyrocket as interest rates drop as well as give the purchaser an investment income. Because once interest rates are now close to zero, it's also likely that they could increase as well as the owners would then lose their money. Its high return could be due to a drop in interest rates, and not only will it not be replicated, but the low or even low return will almost definitely be followed by either a rise in interest rates.
Answer:
Since a perfectly competitive firm must accept the price for its output as determined by the product’s market demand and supply, it cannot choose the price it charges. Rather, the perfectly competitive firm can choose to sell any quantity of output at exactly the same price. This implies that the firm faces a perfectly elastic demand curve for its product: buyers are willing to buy any number of units of output from the firm at the market price. When the perfectly competitive firm chooses what quantity to produce, then this quantity—along with the prices prevailing in the market for output and inputs—will determine the firm’s total revenue, total costs, and ultimately, level of profits.
I believe the answer is -A!
Have a Warm and Wonderful Day!!
Answer:
no restrictions on trade
Explanation:
Comparative advantage in economics is the ability of an individual or country to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost better than another individual or country.
The comparative advantage gives a country a stronger sales margin than their competitors as they are able to sell their specific products or render their peculiar services at a lower opportunity cost.
In 1817, David Ricardo who is an english political economist talked about the law of comparative advantage in his book “On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation." where he asserted that countries can become better off by specializing in what they do or produce best and eliminate trade barriers (restrictions).
This simply means that, any country applying the principle of comparative advantage, would enjoy an increase in output and consequently, a boost in their Gross Domestic Products (GDP).
Hence, according to the theory of comparative advantage, consumers in all nations can consume more if there are no restrictions on trade.
The answer this this question is simply “A”.. (“Expense”)
