It’s a complete sentence.
I think that the best answer here is "sharply": it implies a judgement: that the speaker thinks that they were very split over their differences.
All the other options refer to facts, even if the facts are about arguing, which itself is loaded emotionally.
Answer:
to understand the text and also to build confidence in yourself
Answer:
the difference is only a little because it is very similar..only involves tension..not that there is a difference..usually the difference lies in the atmosphere when reading or presenting the narration
Explanation:
may be useful
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
