Answer:
The correct answer is 10.72% ( Approx.).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Debt ratio = 46.5%
Capital intensity ratio = 2.51 times
Profit margins = 21%
Dividend payout = 38%
Formula to calculate sustainable growth rate ae as follows:
Sustainable growth rate = (Earnings retention rate × Return on equity ) / ( 1 - (ROE × RR)
where, Retention rate =(1 - dividend payout rate)
= (1-0.38) = 0.62
ROE = Profit margin × Total asset turonver × Equity multipler
= Profit margin × 1/capital intensity ratio × 1/(1-debt ratio)
= .21 × (1/2.51) × 1/(1-.465)
= .21 × 0.398 × 1.869
= 0.1562
=15.62%
So, Sustainable growth rate = (0.1562*0.62) / 1 - (0.1562*0.62)
= 0.096844 / 0.903156
= 0.1072
= 10.72% (approx.)
Hence, the correct answer is 10.72% (approx.).
Answer:
C.principal-agent problems.
Explanation:
The acquisition of Movo Automobile is a typical example of AGENCY COST. Under the Agency cost theory, managers are agents of shareholders who represents principal in the principal - agent problem.
Agency cost is a situation where agents become selfish and pursue strategies and policies that will promote the self interest of agents and cause dissatisfaction to principals.
When a business is able to grow by exporting its products around the world, it can frequently attain larger economies of scale, which leads to reduced unit costs.
A company's production unit cost often goes down as it grows. This reduction is the result of economies of scale. By employing the least expensive production techniques, profits will be maximized.
Consumers' prices are lowered as a result of lower cost-per-unit, which increases their real wages overall and makes it easier for them to locate affordable goods.
Businesses from one country offer their goods and services to clients or consumers in another country through the exporting process.
When a company produces more goods at a larger scale while paying less money on average per unit of output, this is a phenomenon known as economies of scale.
Learn more about economies of scale here:
brainly.com/question/23633985
#SPJ4
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
If the difference in average spending amounts between the two groups is determined to be statistically significant, it would be legitimate to draw such a conclusion.
Why?
Those who were told that it was a Tuition rebate, a reward of sorts, had spent on average, $22.04 whilst those who thought it was simply bonus income had spent significantly less at $9.55.
This means that indeed there is a CAUSE and EFFECT conclusion to be drawn between what the money was called and how much was spent because it is clear that when called a tuition rebate, more of it is spent as opposed to it being called a Bonus income.
Answer:
Maria spends all of her money on paperback novels and beignets In 2011 she Earned $27 per hour, the price of a paperback novel was $9, and the price of a beignet was $3.
Following give the nominal value of a variable: -
- The price of a beignet is $3 in 2011
- Maria's wage is $27 per hour in 2011
Following give the real value of a variable:
- The price of a paperback novel is 3 beignets in 2011
- Maria's wage is 9 beignets per hour in 2011.
Suppose that the Fed sharply macaws the money supply between 2011 and 2016 In 2016, Maria's wage has risen to $54 per hour. The price of a paperback novel is $18 and the price of a beignet is $6
In 2016, the relative price of a paperback novel is 3 beignet
Between 2011 and 2016, the nominal value of Maria's wage increases and the real value of her wage remains the same.
Monetary neutrality is the proposition that a change in the money supply affecis nominal variables and does not affecis real variables
