1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Trava [24]
3 years ago
15

One colony was founded with the hope that it would prevent the Spanish from attacking the other colonies. Which region was this

History
2 answers:
borishaifa [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The colony that was founded with the hope that it would prevent the Spanish from attacking the other colonies was in the southeast region.

Explanation:

This colony was Georgia (named after King George II), which was the last formally founded colony to become part of the later United States. The initial reason for founding this colony was to have a place to send English debtors since prisons in England were becoming overcrowded. However, the primary purpose was to have a "buffer" area that would <em>prevent or slow down</em> possible Spanish attacks to the northern colonies.

<u>Buffer:</u> something or someone that helps protect from harm.

joja [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

georgia in the southern colonies

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explain some of the ways that war affected women
Vadim26 [7]
Women raise children and have to watch them go off into war which is obviously hard. Also women had to raise children and take care of farms while their husbands were away. Some women were used as spies. Women were probably devastated when their husbands die or grateful and happy if or when they returned. I hope this answers your question because I'm kind of confused on exactly what you're asking. :)
7 0
3 years ago
Which letter indicates the route vasco de gama followed
serg [7]
The answer is A. Vasco Da Gama traveled from Portugal, to Africa, and finally to India.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0
1 year ago
When you state or set something forth in words, you have ______ yourself.
NemiM [27]
When you state or set something forth in words, you have expressed yourself.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would be considered an accurate statement regarding the Olive Branch Petition?
rjkz [21]
Hello There!

The correct answer is option C. <span>The Olive Branch Petition issued a protest against the harsh policies of the British and asked the king to withdraw the Coercive Acts and put a stop to the war.</span>

Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :) 

- Hannah ❤
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1.La "pequeña edad de hielo" fue un periodo de altas temperaturas. 2.La guerra de los Treinta Años provocó más de cuatro millone
    14·1 answer
  • Booker T. Washington’s beliefs about African Americans and equality?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
    7·1 answer
  • What basic rights, ideals or principals does the document claim individuals have?
    15·1 answer
  • Germany set the pattern of a conscription to prepare their forces for future conflicts. True False
    12·2 answers
  • What role do you think violence has in resisting colonialism?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ ASAP!! I need help!!
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why the Mayflower Compact was significant in history. You should have a minimum of 2 sentences.
    10·1 answer
  • Why would railroad companies try to influence farmers' meetings?
    13·1 answer
  • Misty Copeland is the second African American to reach the level of soloist in the American Ballet Theater (ABT). A woman of col
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!