Motivation is maximized when supervisors make rewards contingent on performance. Rewards or outcomes should be perceived by employees as equaling the inputs they give. Experience, abilities, and effort inputs should explain differences in pay, responsibility, and other outcomes.
Expectation theory proposes that people behave or behave in certain ways because they are motivated to choose certain actions over others because the expected outcome of the chosen action is expected. increase.
Expectation theory posits that people are motivated when they know that extra effort will be recognized and rewarded (Vroom, 1964). As a result, companies with performance-linked compensation can expect improvements. Performance-based payments can tie rewards to the amount of product an employee produces.
Learn more about expectancy theory here: brainly.com/question/13891821
#SPJ4
Best Answer:<span> </span><span>One key thing to know when considering Hammurabi's "Code" is that it is NOT the first "law code" in Mesopotamian history. Rather, it stands in a line with a number of earlier Sumerian codes (though, unfortunately, these are not as completely preserved).
Here are a handful of things this "Code" seem to reveal about Hammurabi and the society in which he lived:
1) The fact that Hammurabi was following the pattern of several earlier (Sumerian) rulers in issuing this "code" suggests he was NOT trying to establish something brand new (even though the prologue brags a bit about his surpassing his predecessors). He saw himself as much like these earlier rulers, and was declaring his legitimacy and suitedness to rule -- since he was a good "shepherd" looking after his people. (This image, emphasized in H's "prologue" to the code, was a common Mesopotamian image for good rulers.)
2) The fact that H. published it at the BEGINNING of his reign --those other rulers did so LATE in their rule-- suggests that the situation was very STABLE at the time. H did not have to spend a lot of time gaining control and fighting for reforms.
3) The same stability & conservatism is suggested by the great SIMILARITY in the sort of principles expressed in the law in comparison with what we have (though incomplete) from the earlier laws (esp of Lipit-Ishtar).
4) There WERE class distinctions that came into play. Thus, for instance, the penalty for injury to a slave would not be as severe as that to a social equal, let alone a superior. (The "eye for an eye" principle -- which is about making sure the punishment is suited to the crime [not excessive] NOT about "getting revenge" -- only actually applied if the parties were of equal social standing.)
5) The legal system was not only stable but rather complex. The laws (like Lipit-Ishtar's) even reflect the more advanced idea of "tort" (that is, damages for an injured party when there is no evidence of criminal intent). All of this indicates a complex society with experienced leading classes (offiicals, priests, etc).
6) The way the "code" is organized does not suggest an attempt at absolute, careful completeness -- it rather represents more a representative COLLECTION, perhaps of the way such cases had ALREADY been decided, in other words, more a "case law" approach, like the traditional British common law. This again points out the long, gradual and stable history of development... of Mesopotamian societies working out how to handle these matters.
7) This structure as a not quite systematic collection is one reason some hesitate to call it a "law code" at all (and why I use the quotation marks!) More important than that, it is not clear that what we have was USED quite that way. The inscription was posted on a public obelisk -- which itself appears to be a "votive" object, that is, something set up to express devotion to a god (or gods)</span>
The answer is <span>They can see and speak to the spirits.
According to the supersition, halloween is the day when both the human world and the realm of the spirit collides into one.
When a baby born during this time, he will born into these two world' colission and make the baby able to communicate with the members of both worlds</span>
Answer: All listeners hear the same thing.
Explanation: Although Alex and Jeff were present at the meeting, Jeff seemed not to be certain whether their boss made mention that they should expect layoffs.
Listening is the process of making sense of others' spoken messages. i.e hang on to every word by constructing meaning to what you hear. Obviously in this case, Jeff was giving a different meaning to what he heard the boss say.
This debunks the myth that every one listening hears the same thing .
