1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
german
3 years ago
13

What of the following statements best summarizes major anti-federalist argument against the US Constitution

History
1 answer:
Shalnov [3]3 years ago
4 0
Anti- Federalists feared the Constitution would give the U.S. Government too much power and little power to the people, which could lead to tyranny. Anti-Federalists focused more on the idea of the states/people having more rights or authority than the U.S. Government. Federalists insisted the government should have more power/authority. Federalists believed the U.S Constitution would be successful and not lead to the huge debacle that was the Articles of Confederation (A prime example of the States having too much power)
You might be interested in
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Nitella [24]
General Ulysses S Grant, and he was a republican
8 0
3 years ago
In five to seven sentences, summarize your understanding of how the United States is changing.
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

aging population

immigration patterns

growing diversity

migration patterns

family structure

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Pilgrims differ from the Puritans?
hjlf
While the Pilgrims<span> were Separatists, the </span>Puritans<span> were non-separating Congregationalists -- they believed the Church of England was the one true church and they were loyal to England, but not in the way they worshipped</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A high school student is stopped for speeding. The police officer sees a stolen stop sign in the back seat, and arrest the drive
shutvik [7]

Answer:

The judge would not allow this evidence. I know this because first, it is doesn't have anything to do with his speeding or it is not relevant. Relevant evidence speaks to an issue before court in relation to the charge being heard. If you steal a sign, you are committing an act of theft. The student was not stealing anything when he was speeding. The police officer can technically get suspended because it wasn't right for him to go through the student's things. The officer was going into the person's things without any permission which is a crime. People just cannot take stuff without permission, and that’s the law by public policy and history. Although the student did commit a crime the crime would not be obtained.

4 0
3 years ago
Put the following events in order.
Softa [21]

Answer: look it up on goolge

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these is an accurate description of the Gupta Empire in ancient India? A) They defeated Alexander the Great to unify al
    8·2 answers
  • What is a paragraph about the domestication of cats?
    5·1 answer
  • Consequences of the Boston busing crisis
    11·2 answers
  • Why did some Native American form alliances with the French?
    6·1 answer
  • John Marin painted modern art influenced by New York City.<br> True<br> False
    13·1 answer
  • Think you so much because if i wold not found this i wold not pass so think u
    5·2 answers
  • Please help will mark brainliest
    6·1 answer
  • 7) What would be the BEST title for this chart? *
    6·1 answer
  • What teaching style is identified with Socrates, and what was it like
    6·1 answer
  • Benjamin Franklin believed a major reason for colonial population growth was Group of answer choices an abundance of cheap land.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!