The fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
<h3>What is a constitution?</h3>
Constitution is a legal document, which contains the principles and procedures by which a country is being governed.
Hence, the fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
Learn more about constitution here : brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using <em>"force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant"</em>. Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is option B.
</u>
Answer:
i think it is the last one
Explanation:
