1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DiKsa [7]
4 years ago
8

Joe has recently been admitted to the bar. Attorney Dan hires Joe as an Associate to supervise the work of Sally, the paralegal

who has handled title searches in Dan’s office for the last 10 years. Joe is to review Sally’s searches for accuracy, to handle any legal questions that might arise, and to sign off in Dan’s name once the title searches are accurate.
Which of the following is true:A.It is proper for Joe to assume these responsibilities because he is an attorney, and Sally is highly experienced in title searches.B.It is improper for Attorney Dan to assign this role to Joe unless it will significantly lower his client’s fees for title certification.C.It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.D.It is proper for Joe to assume these responsibilities because Attorney Dan is ultimately liable for the accuracy of the title searches
Law
1 answer:
ratelena [41]4 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C;  It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.

Further Explanation:

Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.

The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.

Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
Help me answer thank u I will mark brainliest
Lesechka [4]

Answer: (give brainliest)

False

True

False

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Distinguished ordinary from privileged mitigating circumstances.​
Finger [1]

Answer:

The distinction between ordinary and privilege mitigating circumstances are: (a) Under the rules for application of divisible penalties (Article 64 of the Revised Penal Code), the presence of a mitigating circumstance, has the effect of applying the divisible penalty in its minimum period. Under the rules on graduation of penalty (Articles 68 and 69), the presence of privileged mitigating circumstance has the effect of reducing the penalty one or two degrees lower. (b) Ordinary mitigating circumstances can be off-set by the aggravating circumstances. Privileged mitigating circumstances are not subject to the off-set rule

5 0
3 years ago
How many court systems are there in the united states.
Vesna [10]
There are 2 there is a federal and a state court system your welcome
4 0
3 years ago
How do the presidential roles of chief executive and chief of state differ
telo118 [61]

Answer:

"The chief executive role is concerned with military issues, while the chief of state role is not. ... The chief of state role deals with foreign affairs, while the chief executive role does not."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
police officers investigate local crimes and may arrest those accused of breaking local laws. Which group has a similar role at
Romashka [77]

Answer:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has a similar role at the national level.

Explanation:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was established in 1908, and in today's date serves as the paramount law enforcement agency in the United States. It functions directly under the supervision of the Department of Justice of the federal government. All the states in the United States of America come under the jurisdiction of the FBI irrespective of which political parties are running the state and the local governments.

The FBI is authorized to carry out investigations in over 200 types of federal crimes throughout the United States. Some of these crimes are counterintelligence, terrorism (both domestic and international), cybercrime, narcotics and allied crimes, crimes pertaining to the breach of civil rights, etc. It has around 56 field offices in all the important cities all over the United States and more than 400 resident agencies in other cities that are comparatively smaller yet sensitive.

The FBI also has offices at various US Consulates and embassies outside the international boundaries of the United States. These offices function in order to provide intelligent feeds to other anti-terrorist agencies across the globe but are not authorized to carry out unilateral operations on foreign lands.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alternative dispute resolution definition
    12·2 answers
  • Mike worked for Frank's Pizza as a driver and was an agent. His duties consisted of making deliveries along a designated route.
    8·2 answers
  • Community oriented policing vocabulary
    12·1 answer
  • What was the name of the case when puyallup city council attempted renovations on shaw road in 2016?
    5·2 answers
  • Which is the strongest country in the world​
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Colonial America adopt only part of the English legal system?
    9·2 answers
  • Please list 2 of the 4 exceptions to the Miranda requirements.​
    12·1 answer
  • What is a peremptory challenge?
    12·2 answers
  • Any GIRL who wants to be a k9 officer here...?
    8·2 answers
  • On the state level, which courts are the most numerous?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!