I think it is known as the Middle Ages.
Not too sure
Answer:
I would interview Amelia Earhart. I would ask her if she could go back in time, if she would still make the same decisions. I would ask her if she thought she would have as big of an impact, as she did, for womens rights. I would also ask her if she knew what was happening at the moment of disappearance.
I am not saying I would want to talk to Amelia current day, I would want to go back in time and ask her those time-specific questions. I feel like you can get a lot of insight from it regarding confidence. She seems to hold a special place for those dealing with breaking the female boundaries, I would want to let her know that.
Explanation:
Answer: In ancient Roman families, the father had complete control over all members of the family.
Roman society was essentially based on the family as the fundamental pillar of society, and within it men, the father of the family, exercised totalitarian control over all its members. Thus a patriarchy was exercised, in which the father of the family (called pater familias) had absolute power over it.
The powers of the pater familias as head of the house varied. The word of the pater familias was considered irrevocably final. According to the archaic law of the twelve tables, the pater familias exercised the vitae necisque potestas - the power over life and death - over the members of the family. Under certain circumstances he was allowed to kill his children, his slaves or his wife. However, this right was restricted by social control.
Explanation:
the Sherman antitrust act in 1980 made trust and monopolies illegal.
