His points covered three main things, self determination of colonies l, freedom of the seas and the League of Nations. His points failed because France and Britain wanted revenge against Germany so his points were turned down. The only point that made it was the 14th (the League of Nations). But this would eventually fall apart because US congress didn’t want America to be involved in foreign affairs so they didn’t join. Since America was the only super power coming out of the war and didn’t join the league the other countries couldn’t agree on anything.
The internment camps where all over the US, but ,mostly to the west states. They were made to hold japanese americans, after the pearl harbor attack.
(very similar to concentration camps, but not meant to systematically kill Japanese people) hope this helped
The difference that existed between the Feudalism in Europe and Japan is that There was no exchange of loyalty for protection in Japan.
<h3>What is feudalism?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the ancient practice where the noble men in the society would have to pay the people of the lower ranks to give their services to them. The services were often based on the need for protection.
Hence we can say that The difference that existed between the Feudalism in Europe and Japan is that There was no exchange of loyalty for protection in Japan.
Read more on feudalism here: brainly.com/question/4141227
#SPJ1
Answer:
The term Dual Federalism refers to the political system through which a federalism is established where both the Federal State and the local States divide powers and limit each other with respect to their functions, each exercising their own and without getting involved in the other's.
For its part, the term Cooperative Federalism refers to the federalist political system by which the Federal State and the local States have a differentiation in terms of their levels of performance, but not in terms of their tasks, with which they cooperate with each other to compliance with government objectives.
Personally, I believe that cooperative federalism is more effective, as both spheres of government deal with similar issues, and control each other through a co-participatory and non-restrictive regime as in the case of dual federalism.
