1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAXImum [283]
3 years ago
6

How would being more friendly with China and Soviet Union help the us end the war in Vietnam ?

History
1 answer:
Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
4 0
The Vietnam War was between the North & South Vietnam nations. With the North being a Communist regime & the South being a Democratic state in brought in the world’s Superpower like The US, USSR, and the PRA making the Vietnam War a proxy war to influence the spread of their ideologies. If the US was more friendly with the USSR & PRA then the US would have never entered the Vietnam War as “advisors” and the South would had fell more quickly with all of Vietnam being ruled un Communism.
You might be interested in
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Which style of music imitates speech using pitch fluctuations, rhythms, and so on?
ioda

The correct answer is B) Recitative

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What sort of relationship did President Roosevelt develop with the press and the public to build confidence in the nation?
puteri [66]
Building on McKinley's effective use of the press, Roosevelt made the White House the center of news every day, providing interviews and photo opportunities. After noticing the White House reporters huddled outside in the rain one day, he gave them their own room inside, effectively inventing the presidential press briefing.
8 0
3 years ago
How can congress pass a law over a president veto​
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

By threatening a veto, the President can persuade legislators to alter the content of the bill to be more acceptable to the President. Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Washington believed that the best way to change to constitution is throughA. Revolution carried out by local militiasB
mafiozo [28]
<span>President Washington believed that the best way to change to the constitution is through </span><span>d. The amendment process laid out in the constitution

He believed that the only way a constitution could change is if it conducted by the people and for the people. Which eliminated the potential of any violent force or powerful higher-up to change it.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the American public view General MacArthur after President Truman fired him?
    15·2 answers
  • What did the rulers of Egypt accomplish during the Middle Kingdom?
    10·1 answer
  • The southern demand that slavery be allowed to expand into the territories seemed to be motivated by what
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why british believe they had the right to levy taxes on the american colonists
    5·1 answer
  • 6. How many miles was Da Gama's voyage from Portugal to India and back?
    6·1 answer
  • What did secede or secession mean with regard to the Southern states of the Union? <br>​
    10·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest! What letter on the southeast map pictured is Singapore?
    5·1 answer
  • Who are the rulers of ithaca ?
    5·2 answers
  • Step 5: Create the Best Economic System
    13·2 answers
  • What was the historical significance of Barack Obama’s election in 2008
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!