Well it all depends on what the children for them to be similar or different, but the Egyptian children would be different from the children today, because of many reasons, such as:
-Electronics
-Money
-Cars
-stars
-phones
etc.
The reasons I say this is because the Egyptian children never had any of those things, so that meant they had diiferent behavior/attitudes, than the children here today.
I hope this helps and you understand, if not please tell me what you don't understand, on my profile, :-)
Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
Mostly the fact that we weren't equipped to fight against North Vietnam. Their military was very well trained and equipped. If I remember correctly, we actually withdrew from the war because we couldn't fight off the Northern soldiers.
There was one incident when we were going around NV to get to SV with our navy, and NV's navy attacked our ships. I think that probably contributed because we would've had trouble getting our Navy to SV.
But the first statement was the most difficult part, from what my lessons said at least.