Answer: Poor working conditions, repression by police, violence by hired bandits.
Explanation:
- During the Great Depression, there was a significant strike in the automotive industry. In addition to the daily hazards at work, accompanied by poor conditions, workers at times when they would rebel against such a condition suffered repression from police and bandits who often carried out violence against strikers. For many unions, and active involvement in them could mean the end of the business, so many business owners have made every effort to end unions or reduce their influence. During this period, the automaker, General Motors, actually experienced sales advances thanks to its aggressive reactions to the Great Depression.
- When the economy began to spiral out of control, GM cut prices, cut production of some more expensive models, and laid off vast amounts of labor. GM maintained its hold on the car market at the expense of its workers. After the layoffs of thousands, she employed many backward but did not consider the senior position and paid lower wages than before. Such circumstances have led to the dissatisfaction of many employees. There was a massive strike in the hour when workers wanted to abolish their democratic rights at all costs, organizing unions. This strike is one of the most famous in American history. The attack reduced the unification of the automobile industry in the united states, thereby improving the position of workers.
Overseas, the British and French empires could have recognized the Confederate states as a country. This would have helped them tremendously, as they could have been part of world organizations and meetings to make decisions. Also, they could have set up more trading stations for merchants to sell off items to gain resources. However, Europe didn't recognize them as a country, so it was much more difficult for these states to gain resources.
Limitations on free speech during times of conflict raises different types of constitutional issues. The Supreme Court has ruled in Schrenk v. United States (1919) that in times of war free expression can be curtailed. This has largely been true in every military conflict from the Revolutionary War to the present. The government has broad powers to restrict hate speech, prohibit the publication of certain material, forbid aid to enemy combatants, and imprison anyone suspected of undermining government efforts to pursue the war. Protest against war are allowed under the First Amendment provisions.
Answer:
It was British and Spanish interventions during a series of Latin American revolution from the Bolivarian independence movements in South America to the Mexican War for independence.
