1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
3 years ago
12

Read the passage from Sugar Changed the World. The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented these newcomers flooding into

the colonies and driving down wages, were instant rivals. This was convenient for the planters—who were skilled at the game of divide and rule. The planters lumped their workers into two distinct but equally nasty stereotypes: Former slaves were described as lazy, whereas Indians were called meek, docile children. "You may have work and plenty of it for a black man and a coloured man, and they will not do it,” claimed planter W. Alleyne Ireland. He conveniently ignored the fact that the ex-slaves wanted to work their own land, not labor for their former owners. The overseers praised the Indians' meekness but also held them in contempt. The Indian, one overseer claimed, "possesses the low, cringing and abject habit common to his nationality." What evidence do the authors include to support the central idea that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people became rivals? anecdotal evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people were paid wages on different scales empirical evidence that planters ignored the fact that formerly enslaved people wanted to work their own land empirical evidence that planters tried to pit formerly enslaved people against Indian workers to the planters’ advantage logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people did not get along with one another because wages went down
English
2 answers:
stich3 [128]3 years ago
8 0

The author includes logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people didn't get along because wages went down.  

In the passage, it states:

"The Indian coolies and the ex-slaves, who resented the newcomers flooding the colonies and driving down wages, were instant rivals."

In this case, the Indian coolies are the newcomers and the ex-slaves are the ones resenting them. Therefore, the ex-slaves resent the Indian coolies because they were driving down wages.

Lorico [155]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is logical evidence that Indian workers and formerly enslaved people did not get along with one another because wages went down.

The excerpt itself describes how the ex-slaves were resented the Indian coolies because when they arrived, the wages started to go down. This situation was not convenient for neither the ex-slaves nor the Indian coolies. They became rivals.

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from Utopia. But after the ambassadors had stayed a day among them, and saw so vast a quantity of gold in their
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

The correct answer is "It is best described as an anecdote".

We consider an anecdote to be a personal account or retelling of a particular event or incident. The key word here is "personal". In the example given, we clearly see how <u>the point of view is from the protagonist of a certain personal experience he had and the way he felt about it, constituting it as an anecdote.</u>

We don't know for a fact Utopians don't care about riches, because we're only getting a single man's experience which in addition, cannot be proven.

An analogy recquires some sort of strong comparisson of metaphor that isn't really present in this excerpt.


Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the sentence?
shtirl [24]

Answer:

everything

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Someone help me quickly plz
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

it is the second option

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following citations is correct for a print article with no known author?
Marianna [84]

Answer:

b. “It Fell from the Sky.” Business Wee: 4 Mar, 2010. pp 1-3.

Explanation:

In cases where the source comprises of no author, the name of the title of the work is written. The title of the work is placed under the quotation marks is the title is short. When the title is long, it is written in italics. Also, page number from where the citation has been made is also placed. In the in-text citation of unknown authors, an abbreviated form of title heading is written under quotation marks. In the works cited page, the full name of the work along with the page number is added.

7 0
3 years ago
A group of lines that form a division of a poem is a(n):
astraxan [27]
Answer:  [B]:  stanza .
___________________________________________________
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the difference between a complex and compound sentence in the simplest way you you can...
    8·1 answer
  • In the story everyday use why wont dee bring her friends to visit the family's new house
    15·2 answers
  • By the end of which historical event had Britain granted independence to most of the territories in its once vast empire?
    6·2 answers
  • Respond- "Heaven is under our feet as well as over our heads" what does this quote means ?
    14·1 answer
  • What happened to sams mirror? Why do you think this happened​
    13·1 answer
  • Make a list of everything i should know about the writing process.
    14·1 answer
  • Which sentence uses a metaphor to develop a character?
    5·2 answers
  • I think he _________ the job.
    12·1 answer
  • NEED HELP IN ENGLISH!
    13·1 answer
  • What lies did Brutus tell to the Roman Leaders and why?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!