Answer:
The correct answer is (b)
Explanation:
Interpretive research is based on predicting and analysing consumer behaviour based on the socio-historic context. This is an old technique to use historic data to predict human behaviour which is not feasible to apply in today's world because people, their living styles everything has changed. Now, researchers try to predict a phenomenon and consumer behaviour by talking to them rather analysing in a socio-historic context.
This answer was deleted by a Brainly Staff Member for violating our Terms of Service.
Answer:
The conditions for creating a confidence interval for the population proportion have been met.
Explanation:
There are the following conditions to build a confidence interval for a population proportion:
Sample of size n from a large population
Individuals chosen independent of one another
At least 15 failures and 15 sucesses in the sample.
In this problem, we have that:
Sample of 100 people
They are chosen at random at the market, so it means that the probability that an individual likes the new design is independent of any other individuals.
82 successes and 18 failures.
So yes, the conditions for creating a confidence interval for the population proportion have been met.
Answer: A clear statement of the problem
Explanation:
The opening of a direct claim message should clearly state the problem that you would like to be addressed by the receiver and would set the tone for the rest of the message.
Claim messages are formal messages and as such, should be clear and concise so that the message is communicated effectively and there is a lesser chance of the message being misread. This is why the message should be clearly stated, so that the receiver understands it and responds in kind.
Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Units Started into the production = 14,000 Units
Ending work in process = 2,000 units
Transferred Units = Units in the starting - Ending work in process
= 14,000 units - 2,000 Units
= 12,000 Units
Equivalent units = Transferred units + Ending work in process in units × % of Completion
= 12,000 Units + 2,000 Units × 25% complete
= 12,000 + 2,000 × 0.25
= 12,000 units + 500 units
= 12,500 units
Total Conversion cost = $52,500

= $4.2