Answer and Explanation:
The computation of two different depreciation schedules is shown below:-
a. Using the Double-declining balance method
Year Equipment Cost Depreciation rate Amount
2005 $90,000 50% $45,000
2006 $45,000 50% $22,500
2007 $22,500 50% $11,250
2008 No depreciation as it is lower that straight line method that is $22,500 also we took the double rate of 25% so we consider 50%
b. Using the straight line method
Straight Line Depreciation Method:
$100,000 - $10,000
= $90,000
Year Equipment Cost Depreciation rate Amount
2005 $90,000 25% $22,500
2006 $90,000 25% $22,500
2007 $90,000 25% $22,500
2008 $90,000 25% $22,500
Depreciation rate is
= 1 ÷ 4 years
= 25
2. The double declining method reduced the net income while the straight line method increased the net icnome
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": functional.
Explanation:
Functional changes are implemented in products to improve the benefits of an existing good or service or to fix a recurrent problem the same product used to have. In the case of Sony's design for the new plasma television, it would allow the television's remote control to be easier to use, improving the consumer experience with the good.
Answer:
500
Explanation:
please find attached the table referred to in this question and a second table where marginal cost is included
A perfect competition is characterised by many buyers and sellers of homogeneous goods and services. Market prices are set by the forces of demand and supply.
in a perfect competition, price = marginal cost = marginal revenue
Marginal cost = total cost 2 - total cost 1
e.g. marginal cost at 2 units of output = $7 - $2 = $5
Hank and Helen would supply at the point where marginal cost is equal to $5.
looking at the second attached table, there are two points where marginal cost is equal to $5. at output 1 and output 5.
at output one, Hank and Helen would be earning a loss because total cost is greater than total revenue. so they would not supply at this point.
at output five, Hank and Helen would earn a profit and thus would supply at 5 units of output.
Since all firms face and identical cost structure, the industry supply would be 100 x 5 = 500 pounds
Answer: $15,060
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Ben and Jerry were shareholders of Water Ice Inc., an S corp. On Jan. 1, 1998, Ben owned 40 shares and Jerry owned 60 shares.
We are further told that Ben sold his shares to Joe for $10,000 on March 31, 1998 and that the corp. reported a $50,000 loss at the end of 1998. The loss that will be allocated to Joe will be:
= $50,000 × 40% × 9/12
= $50,000 × 0.4 × 0.75
= $15,000
The closest figure we have close to that is $15,060 which is option B
a) Internal consistency
Explanation:
The consistency of different items meant to measure the same thing within the test. An internal consistency contains a special case of reliability to split half, the scores of two halves of a single test are compared. This comparison of two tests tends to index reliability.
