Answer: Hello, I can give you some summarys but i dont know if it wold help so.......
Explanation: Shortly after Herbert’s execution, Stevenson visits death row to catch up with several new clients, including Walter. Afterward, he travels to Monroeville to meet Walter’s large extended family. Gathered together in a small trailer, they passionately explain to Stevenson their indignation at Walter’s conviction, particularly when they were all with him at the time of the murder. Stevenson writes that the family’s hums of agreement were the kind of “wordless testimony of struggle and anguish” he heard “all the time growing up in a rural black church.” Walter’s sister Armelia expresses that the court’s dismissal of Walter’s alibi makes her feel that she has been “convicted too.” A debate arises about whether or not Walter, whom they call “Johnny D”, even needed an alibi, given his upstanding character.
Answer:
in chronological order its
-Mr.Jones oppresses the animals.
-The animals rebel against Mr.Jones.
-The pigs take over as leaders.
-The pigs oppress the animals
Answer:
"to illuminate and convince the peruser about his fantasy of a "Renewed Person"."
Explanation:
The right response to this inquiry is "to illuminate and convince the peruser about his fantasy of a "Renewed Person"." The explanation that portrays Esquivel the principle reason for your article "In the heart" is to advise and convince the peruser about his fantasy of a "Renewed Person".
"perfect chances of verbs?" I haven't heard of that, ever, in my 73 years.
Is it possible that you meant "perfect tenses of verbs?"
One possible answer for consideration would be "auxiliary verb," such as "had," "have," and so on.
