Antifederalism is a political philosophy that opposes the concept of federalism, which defends that the authority of the State must be equal or superior, but never having more power than the sub-national states.
In this case Antifederalism refers to the movement that opposed a strong government of the United States and later opposed the Constitution of the United States of 1787. The old constitution called Articles of Confederation, gave the states more authority against the central government. Directed by <u><em>Patrick Henry</em></u> of Virginia, they opposed, among other things, the novel figure of the president they feared could become a monarchy.
A working family is a family in which the main source of income are the combined wages. Increase in wages will gladden the family while they will be saddened by the increase in prices change. On the other hand, they will be saddened by the decrease in wages and enjoy the decrease in prices of primary goods.
Answer:
Reduce pollen cling
Protect your kid's eyes
Use cold object to protect your child eyes
Drink plenty of water
Look into alternative treatments
Eat allergy-reducing foods
Answer:
Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown.
Explanation:
Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often referred to as Tories, Royalists, or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the Patriots, who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America".
- I hope this helps have a great day!
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
