Inventory Costs plays a major role in ascertaining working capital requirements as well structuring cash flow statement.
Explanation:
In the given example,
inventory cost 40 percent
Inventory Value $400 million
Ratio of inventory cos ts to inventory value = Inventory Cost / Inventory Value
.
so in the current case it will be 40% x/$400 million
Hence, Inventory Cost 160 Million
Since the cost is fairly on a higher side at 40$ it should try to reduce it which will help in improving its bottom-line.
Company should focus on offering on discounts and promotions and reduce Obsolete Stock.
It should work on restructuring and organizing warehouse costs by prioritizing inventory based on their movements.
The procurement team should order in minimum quantities and benchmark reorder point.
Answer:
The optimal method for procuring inputs that have well-defined and measurable quality specifications and require highly specialized investments is the contract.
Explanation:
The contract is signed between the seller and the buyer, and establishes formal and legal terms, and agreed responsabilities. The primary advantages are that firms and buyers are allowed to focus in producing and getting what they need as contracts are used for tangible goods and for rendered services, reducing the opportunistic behaviour and underinvestment.
The CONASUPO, mexican government office, signed a contract with the mexican ranch owners to get all their milk production at low prices to feed the thousands of low income families.
As a seller we would receive $1,041.25
<u>Solution:</u>
You may receive the bid price of the dealer,
of $1,000, or $1,041.25
Prices of treasury bonds are expressed as par value amounts.
The quote price of 104:25 means that the bond is priced at
of the par value.
Therefore, if the debt is $1,000, the dollar values to be charged by the borrower should be 
Answer:
eydhhdhdmdhdhejeidhhdhsgwnwhwgsshsguwbsfdydnegyrhdhr
Answer:
Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (enacted November 12, 1999) is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the bipartisan passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.