Answer:
increase in the market value per share
Explanation:
Market value per share is the price that the share of a company can be traded if it is to be sold to a willing investor in a stock market.
The market value per share is determined by the company's financial performance, favorable market information concerning the enterprise, perceived future prospects plus investors or public confidence.
One of the goals of financial management is the maximization of the shareholders wealth, this will find expression in how the business actions or inaction of the management has enriched the shareholders.
Answer:
The corporation must recognize a $10,000 loss.
Explanation:
The last activity that a corporation must perform upon liquidation is to distribute property, assets or cash to its shareholders. The adjusted basis for any property or assets handed out in a complete liquidation is the fair market value of the property or assets.
In this case, the corporation's property had a basis of $40,000 but a fair market value of $30,000, so the distribution was done using the fair market value of $30,000.
In order for you to calculate business profit you multiply revenue by costs
Answer:
The answer is C. how much wealth people want to hold in liquid form
Explanation:
Money demand is the demand for holding cash. Money demand is also desired holding of money, whether the money is cash at hand or bank deposits. This can be likened to the transactional motive of holding money.
Money demand is affected by the following: level of income, inflation, interest rate etc...
Answer:
Market share liability
Explanation:
Market share is the fraction or percentage that will be taken of the total available market or the market segment that is being supplied by the company. The responsibility for market share or market share liability is a rule originating in the United States of America, regarding the proof of the causal link and the responsibility of a plurality of causes of the damage.
Under this rule, when it is probable that a plurality of manufacturers of a particular product have caused damage, but it cannot be known for sure who among them caused it to a specific victim, they all respond in proportion to their respective market share . Faced with the possibility of allowing victims to remain empty-handed and manufacturers do not respond at all, or to the fact that they all have to respond jointly, the responsibility for market share may constitute an intermediate route that ensures that the victim can obtain some compensation in proportion to the probability that the defendant caused the damage