It would be an increase of $6.000 as <span>the effect in net income ($15 selling price less $13 variable cost (the original $12 plus the $1 shipping cost)) or $2 per scale. </span>
Answer: Document the risk and calculate the expected monetary value based on the probability and impact of the occurrences.
Explanation:
Risk response refers to the development of strategic options to reduce the threats and enhance opportunities to the objectives of the project.
It should be noted that when new risks are identified, such risks go through the process of risk management and one needs to be able to know the risk probability and risk impact and then get to curtail them.
Answer:
less reliable than the appraiser's.
Explanation:
in such a scenario the broker's opinion of value will be less reliable than the appraiser's. This is mainly because the broker does not have all the information that the appraiser has and is making his opinion without this information, which may lead to unforeseen consequences that would not otherwise occur if the broker had this information and was able to see a much bigger picture of the situation to incorporate into his opinion.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the statement that is true from the ones provided is that Wholesome will probably be able to pass the cost on to its customers because they are less sensitive to price increases than the average buyer. Wholesome Pet Foods is a high quality provider, meaning that their products tend to be more expensive, and even still they have been incredibly successful because their clients do not mind paying more for better quality product. Therefore an increase in price will not affect their loyal customers.
Hi there
The share of profit and loss based on their proportion of their capital
Total capital is
100000+60000=160000
Allison's share of profit is
80,000×(60,000÷160,000)=30,000
joshs share of profit is
80,000×(100,000÷160,000)=50,000
Good luck!