The Patriots had more supplies, could get supplies easier, had a home court/familiar territory advantage, and had more motivation. The British had less supplies, had to ship supplies overseas, were unfamiliar with the territory/far from home, and had little motivation. The patriots won because of their surplus in supplies, the British lost because they ran out of supplies.
By the 1890's Americans were sick and tired of their 1870 and prior image of being just backwoods farmers staying at home from the world. Americans in the 1890's were conscious of the great power of American industry, wealth, inventions, natural resources and wanted to take their place among the great powers of the world. They were aware of all the great progress America had made in every field.
<span>A new political movement the progressives wanted even more progress and aimed at the future to make America 'great'. This was the motivation for the new foreign policy. Examples: kicking Spain out and taking Cuba,(1898), buying Panama and building the American Panama Canal there (1904). President Theodore Roosevelt building the 1st mighty US Navy (1901-1909).</span>
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
No, the due process was not followed. They violated the laws and rules of justice because the speedy trial leads to the violation of justice. If the trial is done with deep investigation so the man did not find guilty and then the violation of justice will not occur. so we can conclude from the discussion that the due process was not fully followed by the grand jury.
Give more info plz then i’ll be able to help. what’s the full question
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Hitler used propaganda, terror tactics, secret police (Gestapo), he outlawed other political parties, and made the army swear personal allegiance to him. <span>The Nazi-Soviet Pact was a 10 year Nonaggression pact that Germany signed with the Soviet Union in 1939 (which Hitler obviously broke a mere 2 years later). "</span>
