Part 1:
The stresses that were in the Jewish kingdom became apparent even throughout the continuance of King Solomon.
The Jewish people, by nature, are very challenging to consolidate. They are strongly individualistic and independent-minded. The alliance that was throughout the reigns of Kings Saul, David and Solomon were not unnatural, but it depended upon the importance of the leader’s character. Common leaders are incompetent at keeping the Jewish people unitedly. Regrettably, the Sauls, Davids, and Solomons of the world are limited. That is why most of the time the Jewish people do not find themselves consolidated.
____________________________________________________________
Part 2:
The Kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Neo-Assyrian Empire (circa 722 BCE), and the Kingdom of Judah by the Neo-Babylonian Empire (586 BCE). In the fall of the Babylonian Empire by the Achaemenid Empire following Cyrus the Great (538 BCE), the Jewish aristocracy turned to Jerusalem, and the Second Temple was constructed.
The Haitian Revolution (1791 – 1804) The Haitian Revolution has often been described as the largest and most successful slave rebellion in the Western Hemisphere. Slaves initiated the rebellion in 1791 and by 1803 they had succeeded in ending not just slavery but French control over the colony.
<em>Yes and nothing much would change—the discoveries he made and theories he devised would have materialized anyway sooner or later. </em>
<em />
<em>Hope this helps! Have an amazing rest of your day :)</em>
Spurius Lucretius
Spurius Lucretius was chosen in place of Brutus, but he died after a few days, and was followed by Marcus Horatius Pulvillus. Lucretius was from a prominent family of the Roman Republic. HE was also the first of the Lucretii to obtain the consulship
Carnegie saw the problem during his time as the proper administration of wealth. He believed that the wealthy should be giving their money back to the community and less fortunate, not just solely benefiting from it themselves. Additionally, he believed that if the rich fulfilled their moral obligation then there would be no poverty.
