As fairness is a subjective term, let's analyse this in terms of what countries are able to do in the situation. In the General Assembly every sovereign nation that joins is allowed to express its opinion and vote within this global body of governance. Some may argue that this gives too much power to tinier nation states. However, the General Assembly allows for these tinier nations to be heard on a global platform, while reigning in any truly disastrous schemes via the permanent bodies of the security council which hold veto powers over any errant decision.
Instead of it meaning all of mankind is equal, it truly boiled down to: All white, rich, males in a position of power, are equal.
I think it's a no brainer why some resisted unfair treatment. If you, your family, and everyone else like you were being disrespected, and stripped of their rights, wouldn't you want to freaking do something? So slaves, women, etc rose up, and tried to resist.
Slavery has no place in "All men are created equal"
Deliberatly placing a divide between social classes is not "All men are created equal"
Refusing women the right to vote is not "All men are created equal"
Robbing people of their land is not "All men are created equal"
While consumerism during the 1920s boosted the economy, it also led to "higher debt," since many people took out loans in order to pay for things that they could not afford.
At that time, there is not strict regulation on credit score, which mean that even those who do not have high enough income would obtain low interest credit. This lead to a massive increase in average debt.
Obafemi Awolowo was the first premier of the Western Region and later federal commissioner for finance, and vice chairman of the Federal Executive Council during the Nierian Civil War. He was thrice a major contender for his country's highest office.
