I believe the answer is: <span>lower levels of collectivism
Collectivis refers to the practice to give the needs of the majority of people at higher priority compared to individual needs.
As people become more individualistic, we're tend to stray away from social conformity in order to protect our interest.</span>
Its going to be a, and c.
Erik Erikson´s psychosocial development theory emphasized the idea that the man must face several life stages in order to gain confidence and mental health, those stages are:
- Confidence vs. distrust, which main support is his own mother.
- Autonomy vs. shame and doubt, related with parents.
- Initiative vs. guilt, developed in hand with basic family.
- Laboriousness vs. inferiority, with his neighborhood or school.
- Exploration of identity vs. identity dissemination, during his adolescence with friends or pairs.
- Privacy vs. isolation, develop the search and need of privacy.
- Generativity vs. stagnation, in this life stage, the person looks for family company.
- Integrity of the self vs. despair, it occurs between the older age and the death.
Answer:
¿Puedo decirte algo, hombre, has desperdiciado todas mis cartas?
Explanation:
Answer: 360 degrees feedback mechanism
Explanation: It is often difficult to see exactly your own flaws. Knowing our own flaws is important to distinguish which flaws we can change and which ones we don't, and thus accept them, which increases our confidence. And in the assessment of our own flaws we can go wrong, so it is best if we seek feedback from the environment. The best is the so-called 360 degree feedback. It's feedback where we collect information about ourselves from colleagues, supervisors, and subordinates, family, friends, and include our own assessment of our flaws. But also all those who are in daily contact with us, which is because of work or other needs, that is, all those who cooperate with us daily and can evaluate what shortcomings we have. So we've collected feedback from literally the whole environment, the entire 360 degree circle, and so we can best evaluate our own flaws by taking feedback information from all sides. One of the sides can also give a bit more subjectivity, not to say the wrong feedback, and the overall impression made up of feedback from all sides is the best. That's why this feedback is also called multiple source feedback.
