1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelu [443]
3 years ago
7

pol 470 Justiciability is an appropriate or suitable reason for a federal tribunal to hear or to solve a conflict. Question 7 op

tions: True False
Law
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.

You might be interested in
Under California law, any person seeking relief for a breach of contract must do so within the time limits of the:
Mice21 [21]

Answer:

action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.

5 0
3 years ago
Which amendment prohibits excessive bail
aliya0001 [1]
The answer is 8th Amendment
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To take on the demands of firefighting and be competitive today, what are the top requirements for applicants serious about a
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

all the above, you have to be hands on and be completly sure you want to do this also because there are a lot at risk and there alot of challenges

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A person who believes a judge has behaved unethically while presiding over the case should file a complaint with which entity
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

He shouldnt file a complaint

Explanation:

he shouldnt file a complaint because he wants the judge to go in hid favor and he needs to be nice to the judge

8 0
2 years ago
Summarize United States v. Jones
zvonat [6]

Answer:

Explanation:

United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false?
    15·1 answer
  • How are contract laws and torts related?
    11·1 answer
  • The Manhattan Declaration lays out a number of reasons for the Sanctity of Life, the definition of marriage, and the importance
    10·1 answer
  • When may you drive in the left lane of a road with two lanes? With four lanes?
    15·1 answer
  • A conference committee is
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the difference between the role of the prosecutor and the role of the Defense Attorney in the courtroom and explain the
    5·1 answer
  • List the chief justices of liberia​
    7·1 answer
  • which among the six Philippines constitution is the best in term of the protecting our country and the right of the Filipino cit
    13·1 answer
  • Failure about to police responding late in the scene due to equipment
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the following phrase “Experience in government is an unwritten but important qualification.”
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!