I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. <span>African griots passed down the history of East, Central, and South African civilizations through oral tradition. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
D. In productivity, which is based on the goods each country produces
The Bureau of Indian Affairs was organized in 1824 as part of the "Department of War," since most of the dealing with the Indians up until then had been military in nature.
The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Newspapers used the stories to sell more papers.
Explanation:
In the late-1890s newspapers in the United States publish sensational stories about Cuba and the Spanish-American War because "Newspapers used the stories to sell more papers."
During this period, Newspapers knew very well that the Americans are interested in knowing the outcome of the Spanish-American war therefore, they overblown the situation of the war and make people demand more news about the war.
