Answer and Explanation:
1. he presents arguments that reaffirm that the colonies must separate from Great Britain because all men are equal before God and it is not right that one control the other. In addition, he claimed that the right to freedom, life and the search for one's own happiness without having to be in debt to someone, or needing someone's permission, were inalienable rights, so it was not up to England to withdraw or repress them. them.
2. The declaration of independence cannot be seen as a direct threat of war. This is because the colonies did not have the desire to face a military power like Great Britain. However, the declaration of independence was a complaint pointing directly to dissatisfaction with the British crown and reaffirming that the colonies would be independent at all costs, even if it generated a war.
3. He represents these arguments, showing that governments should be based exclusively on "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Thus, he affirmed that governments should be representatives of the people and work for this representation and not for a concentration of power, where the people should act for the government.
The correct answer is the following.
<em>Peter the Great of Russia modernized some areas of Russian life. He reformed the Church, Education, and the Economy.</em>
One important institution that he reformed was the Church. Previously, Church had been autonomous. Peter reformed Church and was directly connected to him and the government of Russia. The Russian Church was wealthy and Peter wanted to control that wealth. Another reform was in Education. Peter wanted to better instruct his army through mathematics and science to learn how to shoot weaponry with better angles, design better strategies and have better navigation for his Naval. The third reformation was in Economy. He wanted to apply Western ideas to improve trade, agriculture, and industry. This way he could be in the position of taxing more and invest the money to strengthening its army.
Religion.
Most "pro-lifers" are far-right Evangelical Christians.
Answer:
199 years
Explanation:
The BCE is known as Before the Common Era, while CE means Common Era. And because the year is counted downwards, 100 BCE to CE is expected to be 100 years. However, because there is no 0 CE, hence that would be 99 years.
Also, adding the next 100 CE years, that will make the total sum of 199 years.
In other words, The calculation is 100 BCE + 100 CE, which equals 200 years. However, there is a need to adjust for the absence of year 0. This is done by subtracting 1 from the answer, hence, 200 minus 1 is 199.
