Answer:
Folkway; More
Explanation:
Mores are largely observed by a given culture. It determines whether a culture is morally acceptable. Mores wields more effect than Folkways as it portrays the differences between good and bad vis-a-vis what is acceptable. Examples are our religious doctrines and the belief that discrimination based on race, color, and sex is unethical.
Folkway is a way of living, acting, and thinking in a society that is adopted and accepted over a period of time. It is the habit of people that has grown into a lifestyle due to constant use and practice. This means repetition and routines produce a Folkway. It is largely an unconscious behavior until it becomes a norm. Examples are taking turns to speak in public, waiting in line on queues, etc.
Answer: the answer is Regulatory pillar
Explanation:
Quizle Romila ensures that she pays taxes out of fear that she might be caught and sent to prison for evading taxes. The given example shows the influence of regulatory pillar on people’s behavior.
The regulatory pillar is the forceful power of the government exercised through laws,regulations and rules.
Romila was influenced by the mentality of been prosecuted if she avoids paying of taxes
Answer:
an attack by the soviet union
Explanation:
Even after World War II, the Soviet Union was a force to be respected. They have weapons of mass destruction and an extremely different view on how the world should be. We even went through the cold war after World War II for that exact reason.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.
