1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vsevolod [243]
4 years ago
14

How destructive/deadly was World War I? What were the major reasons why it was so deadly?

History
2 answers:
lora16 [44]4 years ago
8 0
Because of the weapons they used, weapons like heavy artillery, poison gas and machine gun.
kondaur [170]4 years ago
5 0
The casualties of WWI is around 40 million. They had many new technologies( u-boats, poison gas, chemical warfare, submarines etc) caused many deaths. The soldiers stayed in dugout trenches, many of them got sick from the living conditions or were malnutrient because they didn’t have much food.
You might be interested in
Why were European countries so interested in colonizing African land?
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
Many of them wanted slaves and they were also interested in the gold on the west coast of Africa.
7 0
3 years ago
What is my name and what show
stellarik [79]

Answer:

Toga and Bakugou

Explanation:

My hero academia

lots of people ship them but most of them think there siblings because of there behavior and hair color

Also those are my fav characters :,D

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
help me plz. How would New England culture have been different if they did not have access to waterways?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

They would have to work harder to have drinkable water and it would take a toll on their trade

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
How does<br> free enterprise help with planting trees?
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

As part of the National Land care program, the 20 Million Trees Program has been designed to achieve four strategic goals: 20 million trees — planted by 2020, and 20 million trees and associated understory. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions — contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in Australia.

7 0
3 years ago
5. What is the evidence that shows the theory of "accidental drift" is wrong for explaining how humans spread throughout the Pac
ozzi

Answer:

As part of its three-year circumnavigation of the globe, the Hawaiian voyaging canoe Hōkūleʻa arrived in Tahiti this summer on the first leg of its worldwide voyage. When the Hōkūleʻa visits, Tahitians say, Maeva, a hoi mai, meaning “Welcome home.” There is a well-documented tradition of voyaging between the two island groups, and it is clear that in the 13th century, Tahitians used sophisticated navigational skills to travel the 2,500-mile distance and settle the Hawaiian Islands. Archaeological and linguistic evidence shows that navigators from Tahiti’s neighbor islands the Marquesas had settled the islands even earlier. Skepticism over the validity of those navigational methods has long muddied the waters. A most notable naysayer was ethnologist Thor Heyerdahl whose 1947 Kon Tiki raft expedition advanced the drift idea that colonization occurred only as vessels simply traveled on the tides. But the 1976 voyage of the Hōkūleʻa—guided by Micronesian navigator Pius “Mau” Piailug—resolved the debate. Piailug demonstrated his profound skill for reading the night sky and the ocean swells and safely guided the massive ocean-going canoe from Hawaii to Tahiti.

Captain James Cook had spent a lot of time in the South Pacific before he crossed the equator and came across the hitherto unknown Hawaiian Islands in 1778. Cook had brought with him Tupaia, a high priest from Tahiti and Ra‘iatea 2,500 miles to the South. Surprisingly, Tupaia was able to converse with these new islanders in their mutually intelligible languages. Amazed, Cook posed the now-famous question, “How shall we account for this Nation spreading it self so far over this Vast ocean?” With that, Cook created “The Polynesian”: the people of “many islands” who inhabit the Pacific from Easter Island in the East to New Zealand (Aotearoa) in the Southwest, to Hawaii in the North. These three points define what is called the “Polynesian Triangle.” Geographically, it is the largest nation on Earth, more than 1,000 islands spread over some 16 million square miles of ocean—larger than Russia, Canada and the United States combined. The linguistic connection proved beyond a doubt that the peoples of this region were all connected. Cook’s question, however, haunted scholars for the next 200 years.

Westerners were hard-pressed to explain how “stone-age” peoples with “no math” or writing could cross thousands of miles of ocean in open boats—long before Columbus even thought of sailing the ocean blue—and probably against the wind and currents, to locate tiny dots of land in a vast ocean. The initial and obvious correct conclusion was that the Polynesians had once been great navigators, but that posed a problem for the European colonizers of the 19th century, who saw themselves as superior.

One solution, dubbed the “Aryan Polynesian” bordered on the ridiculous, but it imparted a certain ingenuity with its intricate and convoluted reasoning. To show that Polynesians descended from Europeans, Abraham Fornander in Hawai‘i, and Edward Tregear and J. Macmillan Brown in New Zealand, built the case at the end of the 19th century using the emerging science of linguistics to trace Polynesian languages back to Sanskrit and to European languages. Professor A. H. Keane, in his 1896 Ethnology, described Polynesians as “one of the finest races of mankind, Caucasian in all essentials; distinguished by their symmetrical proportions, tall stature...and handsome features.” Ethnologist S. Percy Smith was one of several scholars who praised the Polynesians’ “intelligence, their charming personalities, and—one likes to think—their common source with ourselves from the Caucasian branch of humanity.”

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is the president in Dominican
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO CORRECT ANSWER
    13·2 answers
  • The 1963 march to Washington, DC was led by Randolph and Rustin. <br> a. True<br> b. False
    8·1 answer
  • Why is shihuangdi important to Chinese history
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the collapse of the Soviet Union and the power vacuum in the Balkans lead to Bosnian genocide?
    5·1 answer
  • China is classified as a Communist state. Which statement BEST proves this classification?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were Western powers worried about the Boxer Rebellion?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the peace in asia in the 13th and 14th centuries under mongol rule ?
    9·2 answers
  • Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?A. Oversimplifications do not make any kind of historical
    15·1 answer
  • What was life like for mineworkers during the industrial revolution?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!