1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
brilliants [131]
3 years ago
14

How was the process of deindustrialization and de-urbanisation related?

History
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Explanation:

kkk kk

You might be interested in
How did so many americans learn about the events in boston so quickly?
seraphim [82]

Answer:

Many Americans learn about Boston, as it concerned with the dealing of the colonists and the British.

Explanation:

Boston harbour was the main port for exporting and importing goods and was an essential maritime shipping centre. Having control of Boston was an advantage for the British as they exercise the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts. Boston Massacre occurred in Boston in 1770, when the colonists began to throw stone, sticks, and snowball at the British troops who posted in the city. The view soon became disordered, and the British guards fired shots into the crowd and killing five civilians.

The Boston Massacre encouraged the people to unite and a call for patriotism in the colonies.

7 0
3 years ago
How did farmers living near the tigris and euphrates to irrigate fields?
Umnica [9.8K]
Nendjsjakdhdjsjshdhsh
6 0
3 years ago
Who's efforts in the 1940s and 1950s has nearly eliminated and widespread, deadly disease?
konstantin123 [22]
<em />I think your answer would be C Jonas Salk
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A quilt of a country what familiar objects serves as an ideal representation of america?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

A patch quilt (individual parts might be valued as much as the quilt as a whole)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did the decision of Miranda v. Arizona impact due process for accused persons
eduard

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Problems facing tenement dwellers included:
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think kulblai khan trusted marco polo
    11·2 answers
  • Which united states president is most closely identified with the new deal?
    15·1 answer
  • Social rules and guidelines is known as
    14·1 answer
  • The Confederation government was not able to _____.
    13·1 answer
  • ANSWER FAST AND ACCURATELY FOR BRAINLIEST
    15·2 answers
  • PLZ I NEED AN ANSWER QUICK
    11·2 answers
  • Act is another word for?
    5·1 answer
  • What sector is a pediatrician? (Primary, secondary or tertiary)​
    13·1 answer
  • No files or ill report pls answer if you TURLY know this
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!