Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty
Explanation:
Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.
The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Try Using A if not then b
Answer:
El materialismo es la posición de que todo es físico, por lo que la mente también debe ser física. No hay alma o fantasma en la máquina con la que no podamos interactuar u observar; el cerebro y el cuerpo es todo lo que tenemos.
El funcionalismo es la posición de que los estados mentales deben definirse no por cómo se implementan, sino por su función dentro del sistema en el que se encuentran. Entonces, el dolor puede ser el estado que está presente durante una lesión corporal, hace que un agente retroceda ante los estímulos lesivos, hace que el agente desee evitar esos estímulos en el futuro, etc., etc. Para el funcionalista, no importa si este estado se implementa dentro de neuronas o silicio. De cualquier manera, es doloroso.
Con respecto a la relación entre materialismo y funcionalismo, muchos funcionalistas son materialistas (o fisicalistas), pero no hay nada inherente al funcionalismo que obligue a sus seguidores a ser materialistas.
