Answer from Chapter 5 Civil Law and Procedure
liability for statements made during the actual trial or hearing. Similarly, liability for defamatory statements about public officials or prominent personalities does not exist unless the statements were made with malice. That means the statement when issued was known to be false or was made with a reckless disregard for its probable falsehood. Invasion of Privacy People are entitled to keep personal matters private. This is the right to privacy. Congress has stated that the right of privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United States. Invasion of privacy is a tort defined as the uninvited intrusion into an individual s personal relationships and activities in a way likely to cause shame or mental suffering in an ordinary person. An invasion of privacy also can result from unnecessary publicity regarding personal matters. So, unlike the law regarding the tort of defamation, publication of even a true statement about someone may be an invasion of privacy. This is because, as the U.S. Supreme Court put it, you should be protected when you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, two-way mirrors result of the slanderous remark. Exceptions to this occur in cases where the oral statements are to the effect that the plaintiff committed a serious crime, has a loathsome disease, or injures someone in his or her profession or business. In libel cases, you are presumed to have suffered a loss, and so these damages do not have to be shown to the court. Exceptions are made to the law of defamation in order to encourage open discussion of issues of public concern. For example, legislators statements, even those made with malice, are immune from liability if made during legislative meetings. Judges, lawyers, jurors, witnesses, and other parties in judicial proceedings are also immune from What are some situations related to the right to privacy that affect your life? BLEND IMAGES 5-2 Intentional Torts, Negligence, and Strict Liability 87
Answer:
- How has the government's work been in my community?
- How has the current government administration affected the essential factors of my life?
- How has the government managed the social issues that involve me and that involve other people?
- How is the economy of my region and the country as a whole being managed?
- How is education and security in my region and the country as a whole?
Explanation:
For a government to be considered good and efficient, it must be evaluated in relation to the social and economic elements of each community that makes up the country, region or community. For that, it is necessary to ask questions that make direct use of these factors, which are the biggest responsibility in a region, therefore, the questions that you can ask to assess the quality of the government should be directed to issues of education, trade, security, rights civil and social, protection of minorities, issues related to the use and management of the region's resources, infrastructure, among others.
The correct statements from the graph are <em>1. Voters aged 55–64 were ... </em>and <em>2. Voters aged 65 and older were ... </em>
- The graph suggests that the likelihood of the 55–64 aged group using non-traditional voting methods is 69.7 against 65.9 scored by the 45–54 age group.
- Based on the graph, the age group with the highest likelihood to use non-traditional voting methods is voters aged 65 and older with 77.7.
Thus, the graph shows that age influences voters to choose non-traditional voting methods over traditional methods.
Related link: brainly.com/question/21817767