1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
3 years ago
10

Which people are likely to care about the US educational system? Check all that apply. citizens of other countries non-taxpaying

citizens taxpaying citizens learners families of learners
Law
2 answers:
Elis [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Taxpaying citizens

learners

families of learners

Explanation:

ed 2020

natita [175]3 years ago
4 0
Defiantly family of learners, learners, and probably taxpaying citizens. Definitely not citizens of other countries though and I’m not sure about non tax paying citizens
You might be interested in
How can you tell when one abusing drugs?​
belka [17]
1) Eyes that are often red, bloodshot, or glassy

2) Sudden weight loss or weight gain

3) Constantly runny or bloody nose

4) Mood swings
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most important law officials in the American colonies were the<br><br>the ANSWER IS sheriff
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

sheriff

Explanation:

oeoei3o2299222i2k2

6 0
3 years ago
If trump goes out what does it mean for hilory clinton to be preisedent how is it diffrent
Nitella [24]

Answer:

absolutely nothing because they both suck

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

B.Writing a request letter

C.Going to the county

governing body

D. Going to the county building in person

Explanation:

If you wanted to obtain eoples of inspection reports of a state-owned building, what guarantees that you would get the coplea?

8 0
3 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the Constitution Convention in 1787?
    9·1 answer
  • Is Governor Newsom’s proposal a proper function of state government? Why or why not and what are the likely impacts on the busin
    12·1 answer
  • Should the larger states with more people living in those states be afforded more
    12·2 answers
  • The theft of 9 head of cattle is considered a state jail felony in the state of Texas
    9·1 answer
  • Snap dulce_vita16 for both you'll get 40 points if you comment ok and do it
    14·1 answer
  • How is financial security is Handle in free market system?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was rehabilitation not successful?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the only type of evidence that the attorneys or expert witnesses create?
    12·1 answer
  • The current copyright law allows an author to put their work into the public domain if they so choose and not profit from it
    6·1 answer
  • The british passed the stamp act to replace money they lost during what conflict?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!