1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alina [70]
2 years ago
8

What was the significance of the Edict of Milan, announcing tolerance of Christianity, and then the adoption of Christianity as

Rome’s official religion?
A: It caused a holy war between pagan and Christian elements of the Roman Empire.

B: It meant that wherever the Roman Empire expanded, Christianity would go there also.

C: It ensured that all future emperors would be appointed by the Christian church.

D: It required all members of Roman society to become practicing Christians.
History
1 answer:
AnnyKZ [126]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. The Edict of Milan meant that wherever the Roman Empire expanded, Christianity would go there also.

Explanation:

The Edict of Milan was an agreement reached in 313 by the Roman emperors Constantine and Licinius at a meeting in Milan, proclaiming religious tolerance in the Roman Empire. The Edict of Milan was an important step towards the conversion of Christianity into the official religion of the empire.

The Edict affirmed that freedom of religion was introduced in the Roman Empire. It stated that the Roman citizens were free to choose their religion and could freely confess it without hindrance. It therefore protected non-Christian religions. Christianity no longer needed that protection after the Edict of Nicomedia, two years earlier.

This decree formally ratified the end of the Christian persecutions, which ended in Western Europe in 305 or 306 and in the Eastern Empire in 311. The initiative for this ratification came from Licinius. It would later be attributed to Constantine the Great, who had emerged victorious in their battles and had signed the edict in 312.

You might be interested in
Can someone explain this image and it's meaning?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

I believe the picture is a man who counts the votes in the ballot. However reading the caption, he abuses his power of being the accountant and whichever votes he fonds uneccesary he does not count them. He basically, uses this as his favor to see which candidate HE believes in not the ones against him beleive in.

Explanation:

Hope this helped. However, many people see it differently as a picture is not described in words but in how your presepctive is taken.

7 0
3 years ago
Do you suppose that the stock market crash that led to the Great Depression was inevitable?
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

no, it could've been prevented, if certain regulations were in place to prevent the bank and stock market runs

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why did President Jimmy Carter win the Nobel Peace Prize after negotiating the Camp David Accords?
Vsevolod [243]
It’s the second one because I believe
5 0
2 years ago
Why did the Germans need to defeat France as quickly as<br> possible in 19142
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

The German nightmare was a war on two fronts. Historically, Russia needed time to ‘mobilize’, that is, to call up reservists, equip them, and assign them to their regiments and platoons. So the logical way of operating was to attack and defeat the French first, before attacking the Russians. But in 1914 the Russians cheated; they mobilised before they announced it so their army was in the field quite a long time before the Germans expected it — and the dreaded war on two fronts materialised. The Germans were lucky in that their effective commander Ludendorff (who was technically 2ic) moved his troops about by train, so they were not already exhausted by a long and hurried march and were able to throw the Russians back into complete confusion and surrender.

So the Russians were defeated but not mortally injured, the French came close to defeat but just managed to stabilise a front, and the ‘despicable English Army’ saved itself from disaster by the narrowest Of margins.

Four years of continuous bloody slaughter were assured.

Glad I can Help

4 0
3 years ago
Identify the groups of people who occupied East Africa before 1000AD? ​
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

Archaeological and linguistic evidence indicates that the <em>Khoisan</em> were the earliest inhabitants who occupied East Africa before 1000AD.

Explanation:

The <em>Khoisan </em>people lived in East Africa before they migrated to Southern and South eastern Africa prior to the Bantu migration. They were the first people to occupy South Africa following their migration. They were known for their hunting and gathering skills. In addition, to living a nomadic way of life.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements completes the cause and effect diagram. A.the inca and aztec empires had been growing for many
    8·1 answer
  • What did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries
    8·1 answer
  • Witch of the following is most associated with the formation of the Democratic party​
    5·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast NATO and the Warsaw Pact
    14·1 answer
  • How many Americans were killed in the pacific theatre
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP FAST!!!
    13·1 answer
  • What was the main point of the Thirteenth Amendment? the abolition of slavery giving citizenship to the slaves making it illegal
    6·2 answers
  • Where did the colonists of north america ship goods
    13·1 answer
  •  which of the following religions was founded in the same geographical region as Hinduism
    8·2 answers
  • Answer for brainliest :)
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!