1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
3 years ago
12

Describe how company unions changed the workplace for workers and for owners.

History
1 answer:
WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
6 0
Unions made working conditions better for workers. Workers would use unions to fight against working in dangerous conditions, having to work unpaid overtime, having too low wages because of high competition, and similar things. Commonly, union activity was not good for employers since they always want to make a profit, often even at the expense of the workers, so all new acts introduced because of the union were usually disliked by employers.

Nativists are people who are against immigration, and in employment, this usually refers to the idea that immigrants take jobs from citizens of a country because they are prepared to work for lower wages. Sometimes this is true, sometimes it is not. Nowadays, it's mostly untrue but historically it was a big problem for many workers since immigrants would suffer discrimination while nativists would lose jobs.

Sacco and Vanzetti were two people who were put on trial for murder after they killed a guard while they were robbing a bank. They were found guilty and were given capital punishment. This was problematic because it is believed that they didn't deserve capital punishment for such a crime and that it was politically charged since they were affiliated with the anarchist movement.

The red scare was a period in United States history when everyone was afraid of rising communist and socialist tendencies. It began right after the soviet revolution since many people in America believed that similar things might happen to them, so they made a huge witch hunt of sort where anyone who was deemed socialist or communist or anarchist was charged and put on trial and similar things.
You might be interested in
Which Indian tribe did spain conquer in Peru
sineoko [7]
<span>There were many different native tribes in Peru at the time of Spanish colonisation - it is estimated to be 2000. However, most of these tribes were wiped out because they had no immunity to diseases brought by the Spanish. The Inca Empire dominated the people living in the Andes and western Peru.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE !!!!! I need help ASAP I need the answer
givi [52]
You need to use your textbook
4 0
3 years ago
Some one please translate this into non intelligent people please!!!!!
Olin [163]

Answer:

The richest people in the society (like elon musk or the kardashians lol) were called "aristocrats". Over a third of society were women and children, the others were men. Women were considered citizens but were not able to vote. Freeman, men who were not slaves (but were second-class to the common people), were not allowed to vote or participate in government (like run for senate or smt). Freemen made up around 10% of the population. They often were not born in Athens and moved there to find good jobs and make money.   Freemen were often craftsmen and merchants. When the economy started going up, the number of merchants increased and trade increased as well. Slaves made up 1/3 of the population, and slaves were mostly prisoners of war (people captured in war). Slaves were considered private property, owned by an individual and not the government.

4 0
2 years ago
S the judicial branch the least dangerous branch of the three (i.e. legislative, executive, and judicial)?
lord [1]
In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ...It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." Federalist No. 78 quotes Montesquieu<span>: "Of the three powers [...], the judiciary is next to nothing." There was little concern that the judiciary might be able to overpower the political branches; since Congress controlled the flow of money and the President the military, courts did not have nearly the same clout from a constitutional design standpoint. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Jefferson's policies in office were less radical than the statements he made during the campaign of 1800
Paladinen [302]
I got to get drop off at my work at home and get drop me
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the reason why Roe v. Wade a controversial case?
    5·1 answer
  • OK so i´m doing an assignment on Harappan and Aryan what do i do if i´m having troubles
    7·1 answer
  • What does the use of the word used selections subtitle suggest about the information provided in the text
    13·1 answer
  • What type of political regime has a king or
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Civil War impact the lives of Americans? Discuss the lives of soldiers, women, slaves, and free blacks. Why did the
    11·1 answer
  • Many myths and legends involve animals. How do these myths help us infer which animals were important to those societies? What a
    10·2 answers
  • Do you think Mr. Escalante treated Angel fairly throughout the movie? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • HURRY PLEASE. Which of the following is true of the Dawes Plan? a. It increased the total amount that Germany owed the Allied na
    5·2 answers
  • In what year did the Spaniards see the Texas coast?
    7·2 answers
  • Which question would most likely help you understand this excerpt from Adam Smith's book The Wealth of Nations?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!