China
sjdbvjvsndvlsndvlskndvl
"Regulating the Internet" would be an implied power in the Constitution, since it is something that the Founding Fathers couldn't possibly have seen, but is something that is in the best interest of the nation.
Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
<u>The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South.</u> For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
Answer:
Nathaniel Bacon led other rebels against William Berkeley, the Governor of Jamestown because he felt marginalized and ill treated by the Governor who refused to retaliate against some native Americans who carried out series of attacks against farmers and other frontier settlers, nor grant him military commission or permission to fight and attack the native Americans.
Another major reason for the rebel against the Governor of Jamestown was because of his refusal to incorporate Nathaniel Bacon into his inner circle, and also refusing to allow Bacon and other frontier settlers the largess of trading in fur and other lucrative trades and commodities with the Native Americans.
Explanation:
The rebellion against the William Berkeley, the governor of Jamestown, otherwise referred to as Bacon's Rebellion took place between 1676-1677. The rebellion was led by Nathaniel Bacon who was the commander of the other rebels (Virginia frontier settlers). The major causes because the Virginia frontier settlers, particularly Nathaniel Bacon, felt marginalized and ill treated by the Governor who refused to retaliate against some native Americans who carried out series of attacks against farmers and other frontier settlers, nor grant him military commission or permission to fight and attack the native Americans.
Another major reason for the rebel against the Governor of Jamestown was because of his refusal to incorporate Nathaniel Bacon into his inner circle, and also refusing to allow Bacon and other frontier settlers the largess of trading in fur and other lucrative trades and commodities with the Native Americans.