Magna Carta
Petition of rights
Bill of rights
Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
I think it's just the right thing to do.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the fact that ideas are far more easily spread throughout the world due to the spread of technology and the Internet. </span></span>
The correct answer is expanded into southern India to control trade routes
Explanation: Chandragupta had a true empire that stretched from the Indus to the Ganges, dominated the delta of these two rivers, and was supported by a mighty army. The administrative organization seems to have been well undertaken, overseen by imperial inspectors, and facilitated by the good state of the roads which the sovereign had taken great care of. It was no longer a question for Seleucus to despise the alliance of such a powerful monarch: he left his territories beyond the Indus and bestowed on her the hand of a Greek princess. From that moment on, India entered the orbit of the great empires of time; its capital, situated in Pataliputra or Magadha, was for many decades the center of a Greek embassy which Ambassador Magastenio illustrated, and whose information is precious, though secondhand.
