In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
The forms of Government in china differ from the forms of government in costa rica because Chinese political system is authoritarian while the one in Costa Rica is a democratic republic.
<h3>How did the forms of
Government in china differ from the
forms of government in costa rica?</h3>
Costa Rica can be described as a country that practice a democratic republic which has a very strong system of constitutional checks and balances.
Chinese political system on the other hand is authoritarian , which made it to be differnt.
It should be noted that Authoritarianism which is the form of government that is been adopted by the Chinese is been described as the rejection of political plurality.
It should be noted that this involves the use of strong central power , and this is to be able to preserve the political status quo in the system.
It involves the reductions as regards the rule of law as well as separation of powers and this is not inline with the democratic voting.
Learn more about Government at:
brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ1
As a result of World War II, Korea was liberated from Japan and divided in two: Communist North Korea (supported by the Soviet Union), and South Korea (supported by the US).
In 1950, Kim II Sung, the leader of North Korea, invaded South Korea in order to unify both countries under his command. In response to this invasion, President Truman ordered the US forces to aid its ally and reject North Korea advances.
Even when the conflict resulted on military stalemate, the United States proved the ideals of the Truman Doctrine by controlling communist invasion in the context of Cold War.
The *Red Scare* was a wholly unjustified political ploy that crippled the ability of the USA to deal with the USSR in a forthright manner so no it was not justified in the least.
