1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
icang [17]
3 years ago
11

What impact did the russian revolution have on the united states?

History
1 answer:
Kipish [7]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Even before the the Russian Revolution, or W.W. 1, Lenin and the Bolsheviks were distinguished from all other tendencies in the international socialist and labor movement by their concern with the problems of oppressed nations and national minorities, and affirmative support of their struggles for freedom, independence and the right of self-determination. The Bolsheviks gave this support to all “people without equal rights” sincerely and earnestly, but there was nothing “philanthropic” about it. They also recognized the great revolutionary potential in the situation of oppressed peoples and nations, and saw them as important allies of the international working class in the revolutionary struggle against capitalism.

After November 1917 this new doctrine—with special emphasis on the Negroes—began to be transmitted to the American communist movement with the authority of the Russian Revolution behind it. The Russians in the Comintern started on the American communists with the harsh, insistent demand that they shake off their own unspoken prejudices, pay attention to the special problems and grievances of the American Negroes, go to work among them, and champion their cause in the white community.

It took time for the Americans, raised in a different tradition, to assimilate the new Leninist doctrine. But the Russians followed up year after year, piling up the arguments and increasing the pressure on the American communists until they finally learned and changed, and went to work in earnest. And the change in the attitude of the American communists, gradually effected in the ’20s, was to exert a profound influence in far wider circles in the later years.

By the 1930's, Communist Party influence and action were not restricted to the issue of “civil rights” in general. They also operated powerfully to reshape the labor movement and help the Black workers gain a place in it which had previously been denied. The Black workers themselves, who had done their share in the great struggles to create the new unions, were pressing their own claims more aggressively than ever before. But they needed help, they needed allies. The Communist Party militants stepped into this role at the critical point in the formative days of the new unions. The policy and agitation of the Communist Party at that time did more, 10 times over, than any other to help the Black workers to rise to a new status of at least semi-citizenship in the new labour movement created in the ’30s under the banner of the CIO.
Please mark my answer as the brainliest.

</span>
You might be interested in
Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?
MArishka [77]
Patriots believed that the way England was treating them was wrong. After all they did leave England to rule themselves. The Loyalists, however, believed that England was their country and believed that it had a right in governing them. This is my answer and I hope I is helpful and correct. Good Luck! :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is a federal government typically created?
8_murik_8 [283]
Central and state governments agree to share power
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did fruit merchants and u.s. foreign-policy makers have in common
Agata [3.3K]

here several things that fruit merchants and the u.s. foreign-policy makers have in common:

They both participated in economic imperialism.

They both wanted to control the market they were in, to be the exclusive provider of product/policy.

They both used economic power to spread US influence abroad.


All of the thins above,were being done in order to obtain the maximum profit for themselves from all of their operations


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might the United States have been interested in maintaining military bases in the Philippines?
Alex787 [66]
The United States are more interested in building military bases in the Philippines because it is a strategic location wherein it will serve as a gateway for the US forces in Asia and the Pacific. Actually, there has been US military bases in the Philippines only it stopped its operation during 1992.
6 0
3 years ago
Why was nasa created?
postnew [5]

Answer:

NASA was made because of the Soviet Union's October 4, 1957 dispatch of its first satellite, Sputnik I.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Under a totalitarian system, what kind of authority does the government have?
    12·1 answer
  • The boxer rebellion was most similar to which of these 19th century historical developments?
    6·2 answers
  • Does anyone have the answers to Lesson 1: Semester B Exam Review Unit 17 United States History for Connexus?
    7·1 answer
  • When Thomas Jefferson said in 1801, "We are all Republicans-we are all Federalists," he meant that A) Americans would never ally
    15·1 answer
  • The 7th century Japanese constitution admonishes: A. subjects to be 'confrontational and oppositional' to prove their valor. B.
    7·1 answer
  • 5. Why did people in Mexico have different perspectives of Emiliano Zapata?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the text and map above
    10·1 answer
  • Jefferson’s belief that the government can do only what the Constitution specifically states is known as
    10·2 answers
  • What role did President Wilson play at the negotiations for the Treaty of<br> Versailles?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT an improvement in the empire under Akbar’s rule?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!