1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
3 years ago
14

How did Royal colonies differ from proprietary colonies?

History
1 answer:
lora16 [44]3 years ago
6 0
Proprietary colonies<span> were owned by a person (always a white male) or family, who could make laws and appoint officials as he or they pleased. ... </span>Proprietary colonies <span>were governed much as provincial </span>colonies<span> except that Lords Proprietors, rather than the king, appointed the governor.</span>
You might be interested in
What is the main responsibility of the president and vice president?
forsale [732]

Answer:

I think its enforce the laws

Explanation:

I had honors history 8th grade im in 10th grade AP history

8 0
2 years ago
How is the modern era similar to the classical era
vampirchik [111]
It's similar in the sense that the predominant type of social organization around the world is democracy. Many countries around the world are trying to implement democracy as a governmental model or already have done so. This was also found in the ancient Greek society. That is one way how it was similar to today. Another thing that is the same is that people still tend to spend their time in the same way hey did before in terms of talking to each other, hanging out, etc. Although this has changed a lot since the classic age. 
7 0
3 years ago
Here is your points nonnie224
KiRa [710]

Answer:

thx so much merry Christmas

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. Which plece of New Frontier legislation focused on strengthening workers' ability to bargain with their employers?
Virty [35]

Answer:

The trade expansion act.

Explanation:

I confirmed from a reliable source.

7 0
2 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the importance of the government sponsorship william shakespeare?
    8·1 answer
  • In a 1903 meeting of the Social Democratic Party, an ideological split developed between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks who f
    6·2 answers
  • Ryan and Tristan are roommates and friends. In the middle
    10·2 answers
  • What were three advantages Europeans had over native American populations?
    8·2 answers
  • What killed most soldiers during the civil war?
    15·2 answers
  • Use the poster to answer the question. In this poster a peace sign is seen inside a blue circle. The circle includes the slogans
    12·1 answer
  • Which action by the state of Maryland led to McCulloch v. Maryland?
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Which term would be directly related to the science of ecology?
    11·2 answers
  • What would the seasons on Earth be like if its axis was tilted like Uranus, perpendicular to its orbit? What would the climate a
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!