Answer:
Total of Xavier's share = $49750
Explanation:
The allocation of net income to both Xavier and Yolonda will be as follows,
Net Income 90000
<u>Interest on Capital:</u>
Xavier(0.15 * 100000) 15000
Yolonda(0.15 * 50000) <u> 7500</u> <u> (22500)
</u>
67500
<u>Salary:</u>
Xavier 22000
Yolonda <u>20000</u> (<u>42000)</u>
25500
<u>Share of remaining profit:</u>
Xavier 12750
Yolonda <u>12750</u> <u>25500
</u>
<u />
Total of Xavier's share = 15000 + 22000 + 12750 = $49750
Answer: A. He will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
Explanation:
The options are:
A. He will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
B. Approval is probable but not likely as he failed to account for the time value of money.
C. He will not gain approval as he failed to consider whether the project is leading edge or not.
D. Approval is probable but not likely as the project has been constructed on estimates instead of facts.
Capital budgeting is used to know whether the long term investment for a particular organization's is actually worth investing in or not by the company.
Based on the scenario in the question, since the present value of the estimated future cash flows is greater than the cost of the project, Ashton will quite certainly gain approval since the project has a positive net present value.
<span>Economists
differ in their views of the role of the government in promoting
economic growth. at the very least, the government should lead the country.</span>
Answer:
3. Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs which have been incurred in the past and which can no longer be recovered. For example, past expenditure on research and development with no current or future benefits represent sunk costs which can no longer be recovered.
Sunk costs are irrelevant for decision making process as they do not relate to current projects and yield no economic benefit.
In the given case, Manuel had already purchased a $10 movie ticket, which can neither be transferred nor eligible for a refund. Later when he does not exercise the option of going for the movie and opts for a concert instead, the amount of 10$ spent on the movie represents a sunk cost which is non recoverable.
Answer: This certain manager should be able to reach out to other the employes to join more organizations. I think that if these other employees are contributing to more organization than others, Then they will be more selected. The other employees that are not contributing will certainly be fired. Thanks this is my way of reasoning:)