The Columbian Exchange had positive and negative consequences.
Some of the positive consequences were the introduction of different nutrients and food supplies into the Old World, such as corn or potatoes. This improved the diet of most Europeans, leading to a population growth in the next generations.
However, Europe benefited more than the Americas, for some of the negative consequences about the Columbian Exchange were the introduction of diseases into the continent and the slavery of African populations into the Americas.
Answer:
Distrust between the two countries grew.
Explanation:
Soviet-US relations were based on a complicated interplay of cultural, political, and economic factors that led to bitter superpower rivalry. The Soviet's reluctance to the Americans was because the U.S refused to recognize the USSR as a legitimate recognition at the international stage, as well as their late participation in the war that culminated in the deaths of millions of Russians. Americans had been suspicious of the communist ideology of the Soviet Union and worried about the impact of tyrannical rule in Soviet Russia over their own nation.
Answer:
What does the fifth amendment protect?
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.
Explanation:
Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made
part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons
to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the
Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the
case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related
to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court
explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.
★★★★★★★
True... would be your correct answer I hope this helps!!
The answer is Civilrights i do beleive
