Answer:
c. 30 percent lower.
Explanation:
Since the manufacturer is contemplating a switch from buying to producing a certain item while setup cost would be the same as ordering cost, the production rate would be about double the usage rate.
Compared to the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), the maximum inventory would be approximately 30 percent lower under Economic Production Quantity (EPQ), and higher under EOQ.
Answer:
The answer is given below;
Explanation:
Preferred Stock Dr.$39,000,000
Common Stock Cr.$33,000,000
Paid in capital in excess of par-Common stock (39,000,000-33,000,000) Cr.$6,000,000
As the book value of preferred stock is greater than the price paid at the time of conversion into common stock,therefore excess amount is paid in capital in excess of par for common stocks.As the preferred stock is reduced by their book value,therefore it is debited and common stock is credited with its cost.
The court would rule in sue's favor because courts seldom inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
In contracts, <em>consideration </em>just means the <em>exchange of things of value</em>. There has to be an exchange of things of value for there to be an enforceable contract, and in this case a watch was exchanged for money. It is rare for courts to rule on how much consideration is expected because people are generally free to set their own prices and not sell if the price is too low. That is not for a court to decide (in most cases).
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Credibility.
Explanation:
Thomas violated the credibility of his studies, because he omitted the error which caused a false expected result.
Credibility is that characteristic of certain things that make them credible, we talk about situations, verses or estimates of a certain presence. When we say that we observe the credibility of something we are making a measurement of what is credible and not facing a series of examples in order to make a comparison in this regard.
Answer:
<u>If records invoices at gross amounts</u>
October 2th
inventory 3,000 debit
A/P 3,000 credit
October 2nd
A/P 500 debit
inventory 500 credit
October 17th
inventory 5,400 debit
A/P 5,400 credit
October 26th
A/P 5,400 debit
Inventory 108 credit
cash 5,292 credit
October 31th
A/P 2,500 debit
Cash 2,500 credit
<u>If records invoices at nets amounts</u>
October 2th
inventory 2,940 debit
A/P 2,940 credit
October 2nd
A/P 490 debit
inventory 490 credit
October 17th
inventory 5,292 debit
A/P 5,292 credit
October 26th
A/P 5,292 debit
cash 5,292 credit
October 31th
A/P 2,490 debit
Inventory 10 debit
Cash 2,500 credit
Explanation:
gross amount: we use the invoice nominal
net amount: we use the net nominal
October 2nd net:
3,000 x (1-2%) = 2,940
returns net: 500 x ( 1 - 2%) = 490
October 16th invoice net:
5,400 x ( 1 - 2%) = 5,292
october 31th
october 2th invoice balance:
2,940 - 490 = 2,450
