Manager? I’m not sure but that’s my best guess. Hope it helps :)
Answer:
He has to pay the insurance company=$1840.90
Explanation:
Value of his home=$449,000
Insurance company charges $0.41 per $100 of value in his home
Number of $100's in $449,000=449000/100=4490
They charge 0.41 for every $100=4490×0.41= $1840.90
He has to pay the insurance company=$1840.90
Answer:
The correct alternative is option b (excluded and deferred).
Explanation:
- A professional, funded health department organization, which provides workers and certain close relatives, convenient and fast accessibility to every continuum of clinical governance, recognized as carefree.
- The affordable welfare of the workplace would be a marginal declaration and free of charge.
Two other alternatives to vulnerability exist. Then choice b seems to be the answer.
Answer:
$ 90000
Explanation:
Given :
The normal selling price of an industrial solvent by Wilson Corporation = $ 100 per barrel.
The variable cost per barrel = $ 40
Total fixed cost of the company = $ 900,000 per month.
Number of barrels in excess = 30,000 per month
Number of barrels the buyer wants to buy = 5000 barrels
New fixed cost = $ 60,000
The increased variable cost is $ 10 per barrel over the normal variable cost.
Now if this special order is accepted, the operating income of the company would increase by an amount of $ 90,000.
Answer:
D: The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than average project to 3% over rs, then it should reject the project
Explanation:
Please refer the complete question:
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. The project should definitely be accepted because its expected return (before any risk adjustments) is greater than its required return.
b. The project should definitely be rejected because its expected return (before risk adjustment) is less than its required return.
c. Riskier-than-average projects should have their expected returns increased to reflect their higher risk. Clearly, this would make the project acceptable regardless of the amount of the adjustment.
d. The accept/reject decision depends on the firm's risk-adjustment policy. If Norris' policy is to increase the required return on a riskier-than-average project to 3% over rS, then it should reject the project.
e. Capital budgeting projects should be evaluated solely on the basis of their total risk. Thus, insufficient information has been provided to make the accept/reject decision.
