Need the answers to be able to reply
Answer: The field of Parapsychologists.
Explanation:
The type of words used above as well as the tone suggests that the author does not think highly of the field of parapsychologists. Indeed, in calling the field fraudulent, the author is actively looking down on the field.
The author is therefore showing bias against the field because the author includes no positives about the field. The text is singularly garnered at making the reader think lowly of the field as well. The author is therefore biased in their analysis of the field which means they are biased against the field in general.
If the story would have been from Laurie's perspective, A. The audience would have been afraid of Laurie's mother because Laurie is so afraid of her, and C. The audience might have known that Laurie was misbehaving at school and making up the "Charles" character to mislead his mother.
It is clear that Laurie is afraid of his mother, he wouldn't have invented Charles to cover up for his misbehaving otherwise. This fear would have appear in the story, as well as the truth of his behaviour.
Answer:
He forced himself to ignore the faces turning in his direction.
Explanation:
I think B. He forced himself to ignore the faces turning in his direction. is your answer. It makes the most sense.
I hope this helps!
The conclusion of a narrative is to kind of summarise a narrative and some times to show a counter claim